--nettles/sickle-cell bio-mechanical dynamics--

   i had to go to the scrap yard recently, and had a "run-in' with some nettles( pesky little plants that would rather not be bothered...at all), so, here are some of my thoughts about the dynamics "in-play" when mingling with them( they are not partial to company...or at least not mine)--


    the scoop--

      i suggest, that "sickle-cell" and nettles are essentially the same thing, operating in a different fashion...nettles is a reaction to a plant-toxin, causing the body to super-hydrate the area, to dilute the toxin( see a different post), but "sickle-cell" is a bacterial attack, that the body reacts to in the same manner...unfortunately, the reaction produces ideal conditions for bacteria to grow( a sterile, warm, dark place, to germinate)...i feel that these bacteria go to the edges of the "sickle-poc"( or bubble), and gather nutrients, to germinate more bacteria( and eventually a "tumor" is created, from the reconstituted material gathered by the bacteria, for resources, to procreate more bacteria( creating a "hive" of sorts)...this seems to be the trouble with waiting to long to burst a "poc", due to the tissue, and the bone around the tumor, having reconstituted the material, and after the "sickle-poc" breaks, and dissolves, the material is gone( an abscess remains)--


   the catayst--

      a common reason for this ailment, seems to be prolonged exposure to old waste-oil, or the tar from roofing, or other means of exposure to these oils...why??, i suggest, that the reason is due to motor-oils being created from the remains of dinosaurs, or other decayed creatures of old( the age of these are of great debate, between religious, and evolutionary persons...i am not debating the age here), this fact, that oil is from a situation of decaying bio-material, and the coincidence, that these ancient bacteria happen to find themselves on a "people-saurus", after being re-hydrated, and allowed to sit on their living tissue...is likely not( a coincidence)...so, i feel that sickle-cell is likely a re-awakening of ancient bacteria, meant to break decaying tissues down, re-emerged into the living realm...note to self...oil is from deep within the earth, from dinosaurs, and must be handled carefully--

  what to do??--

      i feel that the issue may be solved by physicians, via the killing of the bacteria topically, before it travels through the blood-stream( likely a topical ointment like "mycitracin", that penetrates the skin, deep into the tissue, and kills the bacteria)...as for the issue after it is traveling, injecting the body with dead viruses( similar to the cure for polio), to create anti-bodies, will likely work, as i feel the reason "sickle-cell" often does not return, after the "poc" breaks, and bleeds red, is due to red-blood cells being introduced into the "poc-site", and destroying the infecting bacteria--  

    also of note...i believe that a simple "tuning fork" may be of use, for breaking these "pocks", as the vibration of the exterior of the cyst, being too great, at the right frequency, will likely result in the surface tension of the "pock's" membrane, being broken, and the total collapse of the structure( the "pock")...

  sickle-cell /e.l.e correlations( dino-destruction)--

   i feel that "sickle-sell", and the extinction of the dinosaurs, are two pieces of a huge puzzle, regarding the dinosaurs passing...i contend, that the one issue( "sickle-cell"), brought about the other's extinction( the dinosaurs), and that oil, is in fact a bio-mass, that breaks down organic tissue( flesh-eating bacteria, as mentioned above), and as most rural persons know, animals with no hair, especially( pigs), like to wallow in mud, to cool themselves, and more importantly, to clean their skin...so, i suggest that shortly after oil began to surface, to the earth's crust( after an earthquake, or many of them), creating lakes and ponds of oil, that creatures began wallowing in them, like huge puddles of mud, at first, the practice would be beneficial( a "positive reinforcement" of the behavior), but, after a short time, the bacteria within the oil, would start to inhabit the skin of the creature, causing a huge pock of "sickle-cell" to develop, in an area that the dinosaur could not reach...this may well explain, the reason that so many dinosaurs were found in the "la-brea tar-pits", as the dinosaur would likely go back to the same tar pit, over and over, to clean the skin, not knowing that this was the reason for the problem being experienced, resulting in their death, in a pool of bacteria, meant to decompose bio-mass...if this concept is correct, then the acts of the infected dinosaur, before succumbing to the bacteria, may shed light on the extinction of many breeds of dinosaur, due to the likely-hood of a herbivore's calf going in the tar-pits, and being nuzzled afterward, by the mother...infecting her, and then trying to carry-on, until the other probable outcome of being a sick herbivore occurred...a carnivore finding, and stalking, the infected calf...and mother...making an easy kill for the carnivore, that would then become infected itself, from the action of devouring them...so, here we have the system for the dinosaur's annihilation, "in-play"...a simple system, that is incredibly effective, in my estimation...only creatures that lived in water, full-time, or dinosaurs that had bony beaks, would have a good chance of surviving the outbreak...amazing, an extinction of huge land-going animals, from bacteria...i believe that paleontologists may be able to test bone, or other remnants, for evidence of "sickle-cell" disease( and i feel that they will find it, in all subjects)...

  dino-summary--

     i suggest that only creatures with bony-mouths, that fed with their mouths, instead of their hands, were best suited to survive the surfacing of large volumes of oil, in the dinosaurs extinction period of history, this would include birds, turtles, fish, whales, insects, and possibly creatures with very much hair on their face, and bodies( insulating them from contact to the skin)--

  note--

  "sickle cell", in my estimation, is no joke...ask a dinosaur when you can, until then, be wary of used waste-oils, i feel that the bacteria within them, can easily withstand the enormous pressure, and the extreme temperatures, present within an engine, running or not...no problem, and will definitely become active again, if allowed to stand idle, in a container, or on your skin( worst-case situation)...lastly, i believe that synthetic oil solves the issue entirely, as no ancient bacteria would be found in this modern lubricant--


   --i feel this b.s., is good b.s., and is a topic to discuss with your doctor...and nothing more--


  best wishes, john kruschke-- 

--cat and mouse/vole correlations--

an epiphany--

   it occurred to me yesterday, that a cat is really a very large mouse, or "vole"( a "marmot" of the same family), explaining quite well, why they are not susceptible to the mercury vapour that i believe is emitted by a mouses( or cat's) excrement...

the skinny--

   i suggest, that they( cats) also expel mercury in their excrement( as mice do)...and, that in fact, most creatures with whiskers also share this unique function within their anatomy...

  the question( why??)--

   i feel that the adaption within the "vole/cat-family" is designed to deters predators, due to the need for wolves, and other mouse hunters, to "snuff-the hole", while they "dig-out" mice, from their dens within open fields...both before, and during, the "dig-out" process...essentially, this natural action forces the beast attacking the nest to "huff" mercury vapour, dazing them, or making them a little less agile/alert, during the chase...i feel that this issue has similar dynamics when a mouse-nest is present within a home...resulting in any dwellers/predators there, being slowly made a bit less exited about things( mercury poisoned/brain cell deficient)-- 

   the proof( within the pudding)--

     if my contention is correct, that cats and mice are of the same family( "species of origin"), then the gland i feel exists within mice( that excreats mercury, into their stool), would also be found within cats...so, i suggest that the gland within a cat, that "sprays"( cats can "spray" like skunks, when agitated), is the same system as found within mice, but, modified for direct use, when needed( the cat can make those around them momentarily less aggressive/alert, via "chemical-doping"...through mercury-poisoning, from vapours, within the gland)...i also feel that this theory could explain the reason that cats bury their stool/urine, to contain the resulting vapours, keeping the effects from harming them( the cat), if they are dwelling within a contained space...


  cat-humor...( be it dry)--

   i have seen a few cats look at their owners like they were stupid before, when walking by their "cat box"( filled-to-the brim with offerings), a few times...and now...i believe i know, for certain, that they were...the poor kitty was probably thinking something like, "you really have no idea what i am doing here do you??", jokes about owners too stupid to clean the "litter-box", are almost certainly popular among cats in the alley-ways, nightly....( if your too stupid to clean the "cat-box", the situation is only going to get worse...by the minute)--

  the question--

   is this gland present within both mice and cats??, and how does the similarity of all these varieties( whiskers??) produce this mercury vapour, within their glands?? is a kangaroo of the same variety( i feel the answer is, yes)?? proving this conclusion will definitely require some lab-work, to confirm it, with certainty, but, i feel that any results will likely uphold my conclusion...that mice, cats, kangaroos, skunks, ect...are all of same "vole", or mouse, origin--

  a flash-in-the-pan--

   after a few more moments pondering this correlation, i feel i have the answer...whiskers, on a species, are, in fact, an "array", or "particle-collector"...through differences in static electricity, the mercury particles collect on the exterior of the whiskers, and, through the instinctual act of "cleaning", the mercury particles are then ingested, into the creatures digestive system, and are collected within this glad, near the rectum, for excretion into stool, or expulsion, directly into the air, for protection--


  summary--

   if the above theory is correct, then the act of cleaning whiskers, would correlate to a mercury-gland within the species...more later, out of time at the library--

  best wishes, john kruschke--

--avril's t-shirt( for special kids)--

      i am throwing together a t-shirt, for friends-of-a-friend...here goes--



                                        front

          

                                         

















                                        back

                                                  --work-in-progress--



     i have three days or so for completion...work on this blog is on hold until this serious endeavour is completed...it's for the kids people, blog's gotta wait...best wishes, john kruschke  :o)


update--

     the t-shirt lay-out is complete...i had to use some "clip-art" to get the lay-out looking the way i wanted( the rules did not mention no "clip-art" that i saw), so, here is my completed entry...if you could say "hi" to all the special kids this contest is about, that would be really cool-- 

  best wishes, john k..    :o)

--bmi calc( by the numbers)--

    i am working on a new way to calculate a person's resting bmi, the work is currently missing on one of my old pay-stubs, from some pizza place i was working at...i will have to re-work the problem, i doubt it will be as good as my first attempt( may luck be with me on this one)--

  best wishes, john kruschke--

--the gravity drive--

   i have a design for something that produces power, via kinetic energy, gained from rotation( a virtually endless amount)...the concept has been studied before, sometime in the nineteen twenties i believe( naturally, i am serious...always, all the time)...best wishes john kruschke--

private--

--newton's beads--

    i noticed a video on youtube the other day, and they invited others to speculate on this phenomenon, so, i believe i will "have-a-lash", and "take-a-stab-at-it"...here goes--


   newton's beads--

    a newtonian puzzle, that is fun to watch unfold( very carefully, due to much force being in play)...


    the heart of the matter, seems to be that there is only a few degrees variance, from being "straight-in-line", between each bead...so, each bead's few degrees off center, "add-up", to a total possible apex( curve), for this reason, the chain will not kink...once the beads are pulled over the side, the amount of beads "in-free-fall"( over the side), before they touch the ground, determine the speed of the chain coming out of the cup...and the corresponding height of the beads above the cup( a result of the force pulling the beads out of the cup)...before they arch to the ground...in short, i feel that the weight of the beads from the ground, to the arch above the cup, represents the "total force applied" to the beads resting on top of the pile, within the cup...meaning, the higher the cup is raised, the more "total-weight" of the beads are "in-free-fall", within the chain, and the more forcefully( rapidly), the beads will move( creating a higher arch from inside the cup, to the ground...as mentioned above)--

  the math--

    by using "distance to geo-sync" math( see my "distance to geo-sync" post, or "velocity/straight-drop in-atmo" post), we can grasp the problem numerically, and determine the exact value of the pull of the chain, in "foot-pounds", or mph...here goes--


   the weight of one bead, x the number of beads from the arch above the cup, to the ground...equal the total weight of beads in "free-fall"...weight of beads - distance of 1( foot) = "foot-pounds" of force applied( to the beads below the arch above the cup, from the top of the pile)...( see below)--
 
the numbers--

       ( pounds)                                            
  ( weight of 1 bead)  x  ( # of beads)  =  ( total weight of beads)
          .10                   x          .60         =            6.00


  ( total weight of beads)  -  1   =   ( "foot-pounds" of force applied)--
           6.00                                                 5.99

  more later, out of time at the library--

  best wishes, john kruschke--

--street hypnosis( self defense techniques)--

  most world travelers know about this one, but i thought i would post about this issue a bit, in case anyone that reads this is going abroad( being prepared is part of being safe)--




  the skinny--


  "cajoling artists"( sometimes pronounced "cajoling arteeests", to "church-it-up a bit"), often hypnotize tourists, and they willingly give their passports, or money, to the perpetrator...the practice works, so well, that nobody knows it's happening( even the victim), there are a few books to read about the subject( i have no titles at this time), and i believe there are some "self-defense classes" that a person can take, to defend against this problem( i may take a few before i travel)...


note--

  i believe the term "con" in the field of fraud, is short for cajole...so, a "con artist", is a "cajoling artist"( it's about the "root-word", and they way it's often pronounced), the same is likely true of the term "old codger"...a reference to a "slippery old-timer", that obtains things through dubious means( trickery)--


  the how--

  the hypnotist accesses a part of the brain that the person does not normally use( dormant, as we only use 10 percent of it, most of the time), in this way, the person can be given suggestions without the conscious person's knowledge...and they will do them, regardless of circumstances, or personal feelings( the notion that they will not do anything they normally would, is, unfortunately, bunk...in my untrained opinion, due to the unused area of the subjects brain, having never been present, for any on the main brain-portion's life events, or moral training)--


long term issues--

    a word of caution, regarding the extreme over-use of hypnosis/hypnotic therapy on a person...i feel that repeated hypnosis, may lead to the development of "cumulative experiences"...meaning, that the hypnotic suggestions, and their resulting experiences( actions), will eventually "add-up", to a second "personality", of sorts...i believe that one of the ways street hypnotists( and serious professionals),  access this area of the brain, is with a very bright light( the brain may be forced to protect itself, via a very bright light being shined continually into the subject's eyes...as a result, the primary area, that the nerves of the eye input signals to, is endangered...and must be protected...to accomplish this, i contend that the brain switches to an alternate "input sector", to compensate)...and "whhalaa"...we have a section of the person's subconscious "quartered-off", for fooling about...if this notion is correct, getting to an area of the brain that is not used, is easy, if you are well trained...by doing some reading about hypnosis, you will find there are many other techniques of use, to "get into" an unused area of a person's brain...one of them is asking directions...while giving directions( this forces the person to use the "non-dominant side" of their brain, this way is common, as well as the method where the "perp"( hypnotist) moves their eyes, in a back and forth motion, rapidly( like the famous watch, dangling from a chain, that hypnotists often use in the movies), there are many ways...to many to list, and i have only read about a few( i am unable to perform any of them...but, i might be getting my head around the concept here)--


note--

  in my opinion, the method of moving a watch back and forth( or the hypnotists eyes), works, due to the subjects eyes following( tracking), the movement of the watch, from right to left...when the watch crosses the person's field of vision in the right eye, to the left, the subject's nose blocks the vision of one of the eyes( as a result, i suggest that the subject's brain must switch inputs, to the other side of the brain, through the "hippocampus", to continue tracking the object...this eventually becomes exhausting for the brain to sustain, over a long period, and, as a defensive mechanism, the brain "switches" to an alternate input sector of the brain( so that the main input sector, does not "burn-out", or become damaged), i feel that after this first "hypnotic trance" is achieved, the unused area of the subject's brain is probably very easy to get to, by a professional, or "street hypnotist"( once a pathway is created, it may be easily traveled again)--



 in "layman's terms"--

   if we see the brain as a car stereo, one that has a slot for a c/d, and a tape, as well as an "aux-in", and an am/fm tuner, the objective that any hypnotist is trying to achieve, is clear...if the stereo has a c/d slot, that is not working, or is being used already( like a person's conscious mind, or a person with a "locked subconscious mind"), the tape slot can be used, with an adapter, to play the desired music( without utilizing the c/d slot)..."tactile hypnosis" works this same way, the hypnotist touches the person without warning, opening an area of the brain that is not normally used( a "fight-or-flight" response), and the desired suggestions are made( "give me your passport", ect...), "audible hypnosis" is another input, if "tactile hypnosis" does not work, and "visual hypnosis" is yet another option( the right, and left eyes, are not connected, but, instead go to separate sides of the brain, the same as a person's hearing does)..."audible hypnosis"( hearing), "tactile hypnosis"( touch), "visual hypnosis"( sight), and reading( which i believe is "visual", and "audible" hypnosis, combined...due to a person "hearing" the words they read, in their heads, mentally, while they read)...these are all input options, available to the hypnotist, to reach an area of a person's brain, that is not being used, by the "main portion" of a person's brain( the dominant side...depending on if you are right, or left handed), i feel that right handed person's, are likely less effort to hypnotize, due to the creative side of their brain, being largely unused( if we only use 10% of our brain's, there are at least nine sections remaining, to use for "hypnotic suggestions"...or more, depending on the subject...), in each of the styles i have mentioned, to reach an unused area of the brain, the nerves have "stereo", or two inputs, to the brain from the same sense( hearing, sight, ect...), this forces a "by-passing" of the "hippocampus"...creating a direct route, to an area of the brain for "programming", that does not go through the "hippocampus"...and is "mono", or "less resistant" for any "information"( sensory input) or "actions"( deeds), to travel...or to be done( "lightning-boy")--


a note about a concept mentioned above--

  i suggest, that due to a person's "native language" being learned through speech, initially( they hear it spoken to them first), when a subject reads information( books, ect...), they will be "hearing it mentally", in their "subconscious voice"( similar to when they think to themselves), resulting in the reader utilizing the visual, and audible, sections of their mind( in that order), leading to an area of the brain that is not often activated( unless the person reads very frequently), i contend that this might be a final means of gaining access to the "subconscious" of a subject( in addition to sight, hearing, and touch)...as for the sense of smell, i do not feel that this can be used as a way to "get in" on a person, initially( to hypnotize them/ or cue a "hypnotic state"...unless a hypnotist has already "programmed" the subject's brain, to respond to a smell, by completing "hypnotic suggestions", or become "entranced/frozen"), this is due to my assumption that the sense of smell does not have "pairs" of nerves, that go to each side of the brain( "in-stereo"), although i may be mistaken( more study is needed)--


hypnotic quandaries--

  once a "street-hypnotist", or a trained professional, "gets-in" on a subject( obtains access to an unused portion of the person's brain), i feel that they can once again give hypnotic instructions, to the subject, without their knowledge( unbeknownst to the subject's conscious mind)...but, unfortunately for the hypnotist, i suggest that the original area that the hypnotist was using, for previous instruction, may not be reached, if the area is "locked", by another "hypnotic professional", or due to the subject remembering the "hypnotic instructions/experiences" there-in...this situation, of multiple hypnotists, or "programmers", working on the same subject( particularly if they are not aware of each other), may be extremely dangerous...seen as a computer program, that ten people are writing, to "hack" a computer, the issue becomes clear...one person writes in a line of code that freezes the boot sequence, if you hit the letter "a" on the keyboard...and the fix is to hit the "cntrl" button, plus the number 3...the other "hacker" writes a line of code that disables the number pad, that is reversible if the letter "a" is pressed...now we have a situation, where the computer may not be "booted-up", no matter what is done, by anyone...this serious situation is easily obtained if reckless hypnosis is allowed to be performed, by "random street-hypnotists", on the same subject( if a person is very easy to hypnotize, due to many previous hypnotic sessions, in an area of the world "thick" with street-hypnotists, a "hypnotic-quandary" may occur...causing serious injury to the victim)...

note--

   lastly, i believe that a person this easy to hypnotize, would be a complete detriment, to anyone that they encountered( if street hypnotists were manipulating them), due to any hypnotist, being able to easily "program" them, and cause serious trouble, for whoever they wish( that is interacting with the victim)...


  family secrets--

  there are likely so many areas of the brain unused, that they are limitless, the way to reach them is probably known, and handed down, from person to person, like a family tradition...even the simple act of concentrating on something, intently, is a potential way, to "get-in" on someone( as the person "tunes-out" everything but what they are doing...allowing the other areas of the brain that are not being used, to be programmed easily), i feel that the area of "programming" must be out of the "main" area of the brain being used( the conscious mind), or the subject will remember the instructions, immediately after the situation the person is concentrating on, ends( the task is completed)--


  an epiphany--

   "split-personality" disorders may sometimes be generated from undiscovered "hypnotic abuse", from early childhood...each hypnotic session, to perform an act that is to be kept secret, or "session", to "erase" the memory of the victim, compiles( adds up), until the section of the victim's brain used for "programming" becomes "self-aware", and a separate individual, is present within the same brain, but located on the "non-dominant" side...i am hopeful that the cure for this disorder is the same as the best defense for "street-hypnosis"...that being, the action of "locking" each of the subject's "sensory inputs", resulting in the person/patient to eventually remember, all of the "suggestions, or "programming", that lead to the patient's condition( bringing all of the sectors together, and allowing the patient to "remember" all of the situations, that both personalities have encountered, i feel that this will eliminate the problems generated from two sectors of a person's brain, attempting to live their lives separately, within the same body...)--
 


  what to do--

  in my opinion, finding a way that brings all the areas of the brain together, on a regular basis, is the best remedy...i am still researching ways to do that, so world travel is less dangerous( i am not aware that "street hypnosis" is a common american issue, although it may be in our prison systems??...i have not heard either way)...something that utilizes the left, and right side of the brain, would be good, but reading about hypnosis, is probably the best method...from the minimal research i have done online, i have heard about "mental locking"( i read an article about "hypnotic abuse" online some time ago, that was written for the treatment of child abuse, the abusers were using hypnosis to cover their activities), in this system, the victim is hypnotized, and a code is given to them, that only they know, and they are then suggested that they will not respond to any further hypnotic suggestions...for the rest of their lives...this may work, but i fear a trained person may be able to regain access again through a different input( sense), and that all of the senses mentioned in the paragraphs above, would also need to be "locked", until access to an unused portion of the victim's brain is no longer possible--


  --seek the attention of a professional about this interesting problem...hypnosis, by untrained persons is dangerous, especially unwanted "street-hypnosis"( in my opinion)...i feel it should be illegal, unless performed by a physician--


  best wishes, john kruschke--