--drag in space--

  posted from my book's interior, i worked this one out today...it may be of some use to NASA, at some point--

Drag in-space--

  Yes, i suggest there is a slight drag in space, due to the “space-dust”, and other “small particles” found within the heavens, that a space-craft must push through to travel, being there, in the way…I feel the drag is precisely relative to the mass( weight), of the average particle, the amount of particles found per-sq-inch of space being traversed, and the sq-inches of possible contact, against the leading edges of the craft…I also suggest, this small “drag value”( in foot-pounds), may then be gained via utilizing the same math within the calc above… with “weight - square-inches” included in the calc’s variables, allowing us to know the “foot-pounds of force” , against any surface area on the craft, in relation to the angle it faces during forward travel…and of course, we may then gain the expected force of a particle striking the forward areas of contact, on the craft...with this method, we may even know the force-of-impact if said particle weighs several tons…but why??  Perhaps we can simply note the time we lost coms…??

Example--

Step-1 ) Weight of 1 particle x modifier( expected particles per-sq inch), = “sq-weight”

Step-2) "sq-weight" x  ( 1.46 x mph ) - angle of contact + ( resting-weight - 1 ) =  inch-pounds of force--

                                                       --( the long-hand )--

                                  ( inertia )                                      ( resting weight - 1)      
     (  inch-lbs  )              ( ft per-sec )           ( angle of )             ( 2000 -1 )                     ( force )
  ( "sq-weight"  )   x    ( 1.46 x 1 mph )   -   ( contact )     +       ( 2000 - 1)           =    (inch-pounds)
        2000                          1.46                        36                         1900                              4784        

                                                                                                          

The above math is in relation to the average particles per-sq inch expected in space, that the hull might incur...this means, we must utilize "inch-pounds" in the final exponent of the problem. due to the problem starting with a parameter of particles per-inch...we can, at the end of the calc, then convert to ft-pounds, via multiplying 4784 x 12, to get 398.666667 foot-pounds per sq-inch bearing against the forward areas of contact on the craft--

note--

for future work on this problem tomorrow...could utilizing the angle as a percent be more accurate for the answer of the calc??...meaning, ( 36 x 100 )...making the calc
 " 2000 x 1.46 - 3600 + 1900 = 1220...??

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Space flight/max-speed correlations--

  I suggest, that space-flight has similar dynamics that limit the “top-speed” we may travel, much like those found in aircraft within the earth’s atmosphere, except, in space, we may have a smaller limitation for this maximum speed, due to the weight of the average particle “in-atmo” being heavier than the weight of the average particle found in space( 0.1 hydrogen molecule per-cubic cm x  16.3871 = 1.63871 hydrogen molecules per cubic-inch ), meaning, although all particles within space are weightless, once they contact a moving object, we see an “inverse”, yet “congruent” model, of our “object hitting a stationary object” problem, found in the calc above, and also our earlier "centrifugal force" calc…so, the force of the object “in-motion” striking the particle, that has mass…generates the foot-pounds of pressure against the leading edges of the craft…the faster the craft is traveling through space when it encounters an object( a particle), the more foot-pounds of force per-sq inch, it has…indicating to me, that there is definitely a maximum load, from encountering "space-dust", that the craft may bear…and also a maximum amount of friction, from incurring an average, expected size, of particle…before structural failure occurs( from heat/pressure)…well above the speed of sound--

                                                               --(the long-hand)--

Step-1)

 1 gram of hydrogen has 600000000000000000000000 atoms in it…divide 1 gram by 600000000000000000000000 =  0.000000000000000000000001667 grams per hydrogen molecule

Step-2)

The average cubic cm of space has 0.1 hydrogen molecule in it

Step-3)

0.1 hydrogen molecules per-Cubic cm x 1.6387064 = 1.6387064 hydrogen atoms per-cubic inch

Step-4)

 1 hydrogen molecule = 0.000000000000000000000001667 grams  x  1.6387064 hydrogen molecules per cubic-inch = 0.0000000000000000000000027317235688 grams per cubic-inch of space

Summary--

  Grams per cubic-inch of contact is above…sadly, this is a “rough number”, we must still account for the angle of the surface area, in relation to the direction of the “point-of-contact”…and the fun continues, ad nauseum--

 The point--

   With this in mind, without crunching numbers "long-hand", we can predict that the total “space-travel velocity value” will definitely be a number well above those seen on earth,”in-atmo”…at present, the number is limited by the weight of the average particle encountered…unless a way to eliminate contact from large space debris is found( we may travel faster in space than on earth, but the possibility of a collision from particles the size of a walnut, or greater, exists...even though the average particle in space is smaller than those found within earth's atmosphere, i feel speeds must be limited to eliminate dangers from these less common particles, the size of a walnut, or greater)--  

                                                               --The long-hand--

    Weight  x ( 1.46 x 10) – angle + resting weight = force per sq-inch of contact??


the calc( without the angle of contact)--

          ( grams)                                                                   ( grams)
          ( weight)                        ( 1.46 x mph)               ( resting-weight)                     ( inch-pounds)
  ( 1 cubic inch of space)   x   (  feet per-sec )   +  ( 1 cubic inch of space)   =   ( force per sq-inch of contact)


  0.0000000000000000000000027317235688  x  (  1.46 x 10mph    )   +   0.0000000000000000000000027317235688   =

  0.00000000000000000000004261488767328 inch-pounds of force, per sq-inch of contact, at a 90 degree angle--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The skinny--

    0.00000000000000000000004261488767328 x 0.083333333 = 0.00000000000000000000000355124062523503744224 foot-pounds of force, per sq-inch of contact, on the leading edges of the craft = “total load” against the leading surfaces of the craft( drag inverted), without accounting for "angle of contact" of particles against the craft…at ten mph…(if the craft was a cube)--

Accounting for angle of contact--

More later…





 conclusion--

   the future of space travel is likely a means of creating a "thruster", similar in design to a comets tail...i spoke to a young lady about this once, and she made good use of it(  i'm excited about her progress)...i suggest a comet moves not only due to gravity, it also moves as a result of the "temperature differential", "in-play" on the comet...meaning, the side with huge friction from encountering the many particles of space is being cooled, from the surface area on the back-side of the comet not being hot, from the friction of particles encountered, and this "cold-side", is resisting the action of the forward side's heat from friction, melting the entire comet...and, in this way, i believe a type of "jet-propulsion" is generated...where the heat spills around the sides of the "leading edge" of the comet, acting like thrusters, at the outer edges...also, heat is traveling through the comet, towards the "face" of the comet, from the cooler "tail", acting like a cold soda on a hot summer day( where the evaporation of water vapour, on the outside of the can, cools the can's surfaces, and it frosts over)...

 the ice tail--

  i feel that the key to the movement is a "convection" of heat-transfer, causing molecules within the area of space directly behind the comet, to slow down, due to heat within this area being in a "cone", or "ring-of-fire", resulting from the heat produced from the leading edge of the comet, contacting "space-dust" while in motion( friction)...so, i suggest this "cone of fire" is being cooled by the action of the slower molecules found in the space directly behind the comet( low collisions per-sec), being slowed even farther, from heat-loss( less collisions per-sec"), of the space, moving from the area directly behind the comet, through the comet, to the forward face, and also, i feel heat transfers from the cooler space within the area directly behind the comet, to join with the heated space within the "outer heat cone" , that exists due to the heat generated via friction, on the forward side of the comet...acting as a "flow", or stream, with cooler space mixing with warmer space, in an "attempted equalization", of the two temperatures, within the flow of heat spilling around the forward surface of the comet...via natural processes, resulting in a pocket of "super-cold space", directly behind the comet...and an "ice tail" to boot( for more about "thermo-dynamics/cooling effects", see my earlier "thermo-dynamics" post)...lastly, the 0.1 hydrogen molecules found within the dust of space, are likely being burned within the "outer halo" of the comet's "ice tail", from contacting the heat spilling off the edges of the comet's leading surfaces, and being ignited( working in the same manner as a modern jet's "afterburner")...adding to the fire trailing off the front "face" of the comet...in short, i believe the comet is an ideal natural model, for future propulsion in space, one that is endless, and requires no re-fueling...instead, collection of hydrogen molecules found within space, that are in endless supply, is the most realistic answer, to "long term" space-flight--


concept re-purposed( for propulsion)--

  so, propulsion may also be possible in this way, in space, for emergencies??...perhaps more...via heating one side of the particles entering a tubular chamber, to create "mini-comets", inside the tube, acting as a type of "rail-gun", looking somewhat like the "starship enterprize's" engines( if the ship moves, and the particles remain where they were originally, it's the same result as the particles being accelerated, and flying out the tube, to push the craft forward)...

  or, more likely, we could learn to collect the 0.1 hydrogen molecules found within every cubic inch of space in the heavens...and burn that for fuel, instead of the solid rocket fuel we utilize now, likely possible with a small on-board refinery, that collects the hydrogen, and burns it, rapidly enough, that a huge tank is not needed, instead, a small chamber is utilized for holding hydrogen, and at the same time, the engine burns it, yet the amount being burned is always less than the amount being collected, so the engine does not run-out of fuel, while less danger of explosion exists...basically, a small collection chamber that is filled very rapidly, constantly, may be better than a huge collection tank, that is rarely filled, but can easily explode...

water in space--

  well, if my concept above is correct, and we may harvest the 0.1 molecules of hydrogen found within every cubic cm of space, this would indicate to me, that manufacturing water is also a viable option while in space...due to water being the natural "by-product" of mixing hydrogen and oxygen, to produce water( completely pure), the oxygen to produce this water would likely be best harvested from a huge volume of plants, located somewhere on the spacecraft, a simple means of producing oxygen, while scrubbing carbon dioxide, in a "symbiotic relationship", where one living thing thrives from the presence of the other, and neither may exist alone, in the environment of space...water for the plants from hydrogen, power for lights to make them grow from burning hydrogen, and co2 from the astronauts on board...it works...the only trouble might be that if the crew encountered aliens, they might conclude that the plants were controlling the ship...since aliens probably analyze everything, and assume very little, until they do some study( humor, be it dry)--   lol...


note--

   a word of caution...i believe long term space-flight is possible with the above notion, but, the cost of soil depletion, of vitamins/minerals, would be high( suffocation), due to the odds of finding good, replacement soil, within the confines of space, being poor...forcing the crew to attempt the collection of asteroids, or other earth-like material, to survive?? ..."no bucks, no buck-rogers...no soil, no anybody else"--


the "upper-range" of travel--

   due to my inspection of our natural propulsion model( the comet), i feel that we may deduce that the "upper-range" of high speed travel, within space, is slower than the speed of a comet...due to the fact that while traveling at the speed of a comet, with any serious mass/sq-inches, facing in the forward direction of travel, half of the space-craft must be on fire...indicating to me that the "max-speed" of a space-craft, is well below this "comet-thresh-hold", where heat incurred is too great for the hull to bear, from friction of contacting even the smallest particles, while at that speed--

note--

    NASA may have already determined what i am about to say, after reading my paragraph above, or, maybe not...anyway, here goes...i noticed online that there was a collision between the forward pilots window on the space shuttle, and a "micro-meteorite", one that very nearly breached the portal( to my untrained eyes anyway, it looked close to penetrating), i suggest, this encounter gives the ultimate answer, in regards to the space shuttles "max-speed", at it's current level of engineering( if the variables of size, weight, and speed of the "micro-meteor" that struck the shuttle are known, before impact)...essentially, i believe that the out-come is the same if the "micro-meteor" was sitting still, in space, before the moving space shuttle collided with it, and so we have the answer, of the maximum safe speed that the shuttle may "cavort", around the solar system...taa-daa...

the point--

   for future space travel at higher speeds than this to be possible, i feel that "metal shielding plates/blast-shields" would need to be present on the craft somehow, to increase the strength of any "portals" of the craft...as well as a collision proximity alert, for objects of a size deemed dangerous, for the shuttle to contact, at max-speed...so the shuttle may simply move to avoid contact, while in-flight, to allow high-speed space travel to be possible--


proper flight path--

  in light of the above math...plotting a course that avoids particles larger than a potato, is definitely the key to space travel at high speeds, due to the joy of sitting still in your little card-board "space-coffin", while someone basically fires a "potato-gun" with the power of a bazooka, through your life-sustaining capsule( that must remain "air-tight", at all times), could be a "less-than optimal" situation, to endure...in all cases...not cool--


  best wishes, john kruschke-- 

--sleep/insomnia correlations--

   i had an epiphany at work about the true reason we all must sleep, i got it in less than 2 minutes...due to my previous work on the endocrine system, a process that utilizes lactic acid drawn from the exertion of the muscles, sent to glands via tubes, where the bodies immune system fights a controlled infection( planned/needed), to create a usable "by-product", that is needed to perform some function within the body else where, any "by-products" incurred at the next stage( likely collected into a gland), are then refined once again, into usable "by-products"( hormones, ect...ect...), separated by specific gravity/weight, until the body finally voids/excretes them, out of the body, as they serve no other useful purpose--

the skinny( posted from my facebook page)--


 
An epiphany while at work, about "rem sleep"--

    i believe the rapid eye movement of "rem sleep" actually produces lactic acid( the true importance of this natural action during sleep), that is then refined by a gland, into a hormone, that becomes depleted from being awake all day( i feel that this gland is the "hippocampus", which is connected to the eyes), i suggest this hormone must be replenished for the body to function...a controlled infection, within the gland, might then separate its contents via specific gravity, allowing the lighter, and heavier,  "by-products" of the controlled infection, to rise or sink...to be separated and utilized for different brain functions...this might well explain the need for sleep...although meditation, with "rem" eye movement, may yield the same results...without actual sleep--

the skinny--

    if the above concept is correct, i feel i can accurately assess the true reason for insomnia, i suggest, that a subject whom is suffering from this condition, is actually experiencing an over-abundance of the hormone created from rapid eye movement, and that a person with insomnia,  is likely moving his/her eyes rapidly, while awake( "rem")...an action without thought( unconsciously), generating too much of a necessary thing, and as a result, the subject does not get tired, from depletion of the hormone...

split personality correlation--

   i feel this concept is also "in-play" within a patient with "multiple personalities", a situation where the body of the subject never actually rests, instead, portions of the mind rest( the limbs, and other parts, do not), meaning, during the waking hours of one of the patient's personalities, normal eye movement occurs( this produces lactic acid from the eye muscles getting tired), i believe the lactic acid produced,  is then sent to the "hippocampus", and then on to both sides of the persons brain( the entire thing), enriching the dormant section of the patient's other persona...meaning, this dormant personality is not being depleted of the needed hormone, when the other personality is awake, and that when the sector of the brain with the persona whom was awake,  becomes sleepy/tired, the dormant side awakens, ready to go, due to it having not been depleted of the hormone, while dormant( it was being enriched with the hormone, from normal eye movement, while the subject's other side was awake)...and it goes on and on like this, one of the subjects personas is awake and depleting it's section of the mind of the hormone, even though the eyes are generating lactic acid from normal eye movement, during awake time( i feel that "rem" eye movement generates far more lactic acid than normal eye movement)...eventually, the person whom is awake becomes sleepy, due to normal eye movement not generating as much lactic acid as the "hippocampus" is consuming, to remain awake, inducing the personalities of the subject to "flip", from the exhausted one, to the persona that was dormant, allowing the body to resume functions, with the other personalities section of the mind, that has not been depleted of the hormone, to take the helm--

about the hormone( compilation)--

   i suggest, that the hormone is comprised of all the things that the "cornea" encounters, throughout the day, and this means dust mites, and the little bacteria found on the surface of the lens( that i believe are in fact, feeding/living off of the unfortunate dust mites, that land on them)...i also suggest, that the excretions of the bacteria found on the eyes lenses, their expired bodies, and any remnants of the consumed dust mites, are all mixed into the volume of lactic acid that the eye muscles produce from normal muscle exertion, while awake, and also during "rem eye movement" in sleep, i believe this lactic acid is then sent on to the "hippocampus"...where a controlled infection refines the mixture,  into specific hormones, to be sent on to different sections of the brain, for different functions, depending on the specific gravity of the compounds created within the "hippocampus"( i believe the lighter "by-products" go up, and the rest descend, or remain "in-place", within the "hippocampus")...and so, i feel that there is more than lactic acid flowing from our eyes tired muscles, it's a mixture of many things, that the eye encounters, that are sent on to the "hippocampus", and then to the entire mind...whether in use, or not--

   i feel that this B.S., is good B.S., of use to start a conversation with your doctor, and nothing more...

best wishes john kruschke--

  P.S. : i was kinda miffed i could not upload my refined post from my instagram account last night...i had to rewrite almost the whole thing,  just now( ?? silly hassle, for what??)-- geezz...

--stonehenge(continued)--

  another riddle regarding the workings of stonehenge is revealed to me today, from looking at an aerial photo of the sight( the angle was not straight down, it was from about a 45 degree angle)--

  due to my theories/contentions, involving the temple of Amenhotep in Egypt( see my "temple of Amenhotep" post on this blog, for further details), i believe i can see "the eye of rah" at the site of stonehenge...in the form of a little "sluice", carved into a stone there, i suggest this "sluice" is actually a "prism"( light box), that concentrates the light that shines through two large prisms, that direct the light, to the sluice...via the largest stone arch focusing the light shining through it, into the next arch in front of it...and this arch has a smaller opening, so, i feel this concentrates the light from the first arch, into a "light beam"...like a type of magnifier...afterword, the beam of light is then further refined, by a "sluice-stone", or "eye-of-rah" stone...which i believe further concentrates the light-beam when it goes down this "sluice", creating a type of "laser", or "super-concentrated light-beam"( i suggest that the sides of the "sluice" reflect light to the center of the slide, and downward...generating a beam, and directing it), this "sluice-stone", is then aligned with a flat stone, or "reflector", to be read by a "viewer", at the best time to plant crops for the year( to gain the best crop yields)...meaning, the stone becomes so hot from the light-beam hitting it, that it elongates, from expansion...and this expansion, allows the writing on the stone to be easily legible...to an unfortunate person, chosen to read the stone( the "white witch")...i theorize she wears a "wreath" on her head, to keep her from passing out, from the pain of her burns incurred during the reading( mostly to her face)--

summary--

  i feel this system is the same as the one utilized in Egypt's "temple of Amenhotep", so, if you study pictures of "Amenhotep", on your own( from above especially), the situation is obvious...stonehenge is also a solar calendar, like "Amenhotep's sun-court", and those whom made the structures at stonehenge, are indeed persons whom escaped from Egypt...with a secret system, to build society...with straight roads, good light in their homes...and all the food they would ever need--

   i have modified a few photos i found today online, to make my discovery more obvious, to all...

best wishes, john kruschke--

--evolutionary progression( scientific/religous)--

  this post is a continuation of my previous post, regarding my theories of the precise progression/evolution of man, and the importance of the lowly vole/mouse...that made it all possible--


  the skinny--

  if you read my earlier post, you will note that i am suggesting the main contribution that the vole provided to creation, was the fact that the vole can rapidly adapt/evolve to environmental stimuli, while still retaining the original vole genetic model...meaning, that the vole can easily generate an offspring that has a favorable adaptation, while future generations of voles "down the time-line" might be the same as the original vole....before the adaptation( unlike the "hybrid"/evolved offspring)...i suggest that this trait is dominant, when the vole cross-breeds with other animals, and, i also feel that the vole cross-bread with all of the species possible( from prehistoric times, until the present day)...


the way--

  so...to start with, how could a large animal mate with a tiny vole??, well, the larger creature's species, could have produced a "runt", that became able to bear a child, early, and a male vole( the smaller species), may have grown to be quite large( for the species), allowing a mating pair between the larger, and smaller creatures, to be possible...and so...i suggest, that the ancient Egyptians that had painted half-men/half-dog images( found in Egyptian hieroglyphs, and their ancient religious texts), were in fact, the Egyptians trying to tell us how we all evolved...via the vole( although i do not believe they had realized this part of the story), with it's genetic trait for rapid evolutionary change...that had mated with a bird( possibly a pterodactyl?? or other large prehistoric bird, creating the being that the Egyptians eventually accepted as their "sun-god")...with some further study, i believe this concept might well explain, the whole story of the sun god( in Egyptian history), that came down form the sky, to join man...and rule( creating the "pharaohs")...to investigate the validity of this contention, we might study Egyptian written history( "hieroglyphs"), and in this volume of ancient data, we will indeed find "winged men", in many, many images( the "sun-god"..."rah", likely named that due to people having to look upwards, to see the gliding man, with the bright sun in the back-ground)...i suggest, that this notion is the true reason, king Tutankhamun's tomb had a container inside it with the images of four "winged men"  engraved on the outside walls, with wings out-stretched, on each side of the container...to create a type of "light-box"( see my earlier post, regarding the temple of "Ahmenotep III", to fully grasp the precise purpose for these engravings), i feel that this concept of large "hybrid" beings, would also better explain the Mayan temples...due to the best way to coax a huge flying person, that was a glider, like modern eagles are, would be to put a large injured creature/person, in a high perch( that was flat, to lay the bait/offering)...where they could land, and feast...after the feast, a meeting of men, and half-men, would be possible...i feel that this may explain one of the two main purposes, of the Mayan temples, very well( see my earlier post regarding "surveying", for more about the Mayan temples, and the second good reason they were built)...


  gliders( pterodactyls/prehistoric birds)--

  so, i suggest that the "pterodactyl" easily survived the extinction of the dinosaur age, due to their beaks being able to withstand contact with "sickle-cell", aka "melanomas"( see my post about the extinction of the dinosaurs, for more regarding this topic), and that they were "super-gliders"...i believe that a "pterodactyl" mated with a prehistoric vole, and the dominant trait for rapid genetic evolution, was carried to the hybrid offspring( as well as the structure of the creature having four slim limbs, with hands/feet), eventually, i suggest that these "hybrid offspring" made contact with creatures/persons on land( while preying upon them, for food), bringing much knowledge, that only soaring creatures would know( due to their being in a higher altitude, most of their lives, allowing them to understand the natural way that light behaves..."light-box design/prisms"...bending light/refracting it..as well as "magnification"(...a condition that is sometimes found during a light rain), along with a way to plot a straight course( from one point on the globe, to another, ect...ect..), the notion fits, just right--


some proof--

  the way that i suggest these prehistoric creatures plotted a course from one point to the next, was as simple as three gliders flying together... with the second one from the front lining it's-self up, with the first, via the third glider directly behind it, yelling to the second glider in the trio, to go left, or right...meaning, the third glider fling in the column steers the procession...i believe this third glider corrects the flight of the second glider, so that the silhouette of this second flyer, aligns with the lead flyer's silhouette( producing three straight points, "determining a plain"...allowing long-term, straight flight-paths, to any destination desired...in prehistoric times...essentially, an "optical system" of gaining a "straight" line), i feel this is also the means that migrating birds still use, to get from one point, to the next, during the migratory seasons...a system where one bird "calls out", to the one in front of it, to steer the column, in a straight line, to the next destination...as for the lead flyer, i contend that he/she need only choose a initial fixed point in the horizon, to fly towards, and once lined up, the third flyer steers the procession, to the next destination...it also might be that the lead flyer chooses the precise direction to fly, depending on the angle of shadows, from grass and trees, in the area, where the flock is resting...working like a simple "sun-dial"?? allowing the lead flyer, to simply fly in a parallel direction, with the angle of the shadow it sees being cast, from vertical objects...such as trees, and tall grass...at a certain time of day...perhaps just after sunrise??( i believe this to be the origin of the "surveyors system", that i suggest brought us "straight" roads, and "square" buildings, with good natural lighting ,within ancient homes...reducing the need for candles...see my earlier "surveyors post" for more about this topic)--

further evidence--

  i have read online, that the museum in Cairo recently unearthed a "half-man/half-cat" skeleton from a pyramid, which is on display there now, also, i have found a native American skeleton with wings on it that is on display as well( i feel that this would be rare, due to the early native Americans natural, and wise, instinct to burn their dead...particularly if they are not the standard skeletal shape...for the protection of the tribe, to keep them safe from the fears/imaginations of others, worrying that they were "demons", or dangerous....a situation that often produces death, explaining the reason that there are few, if any, "hybrid skeletons" unearthed so far in history), during my study online, looking for evidence, i discovered the Egyptians had a god that was half pelican, one that was half hippopotamus, and another that was half-man/half-donkey...as well as the half-human/half-dog image of "Anubis", or the half-human/half-cat structure of the "Sphinx"...the list goes on, and on, through-out ancient times, with depictions of "Minotaurs"( half-men/half-horses), or "Medusas"( a half woman-half snake...a legend of a women with a genetic adaptation similar to the image that the "golden head-dress" found on "king Tutankhamun" portrays...displaying a human form, with a cloth wrapped around the head of a person, possibly there to conceal many snakes, coming out of the skull of the being??...allowing only the tiny head of the snake, and a tiny head of a bird( in the case of the head-dress of "king Tutankhamun"), to protrude outside the wrappings, raising the question...is this special wrapping on the head concealing a "Medusa" type of cross-breeding result?? and, could this adaptation be from a cross-breeding of a vole, and a snake?? even though they are natural foes?? or, could this be due to prehistoric snakes regularly devouring early voles for food??, resulting in a "trading" of DNA??, i feel that a mating of a young snake, and vole...before either became predatory in adulthood, is most likely the answer...additionally, in modern times, we can find further evidence existing in nature, in the form of a "platypus"( a clear indication to me, that an ancient vole, had indeed, deduced how to get along with "chicks"...literally...ducks...and that is not exactly humor, strangely enough...), so...we can see the vole structure within the "platypus", and also, the DNA of the duck is starring right at your face, if you ask a "platypus" how his "vole daddy" is doing( that was humor...be it dry...i am certain he/she wouldn't tell you, even if it could...nature is a serious business folks...)--



  special cultural animals/evolutionary correlations--

  if we examine each culture on the planet, i believe that we will find each culture has a "special", or "sacred" animal, in the history of the people being studied, in Germany they have the "wolf-pack", in American-Indian culture we find the eagle( a glider), in Irish/Scottish culture we find the saying( "ahhh but you are a fox", potentially explaining the exact source of the culture's red hair?? a gene from the red fox?? )...the boar in Mexico, ect...ect...this concept was further validated, in my opinion, from a very old "totem-pole" i viewed, in Wisconsin dells, wisconsin... many months ago( i believe the "totem pole" is the way native Americans preserved history, for future generations), the "totem pole" i examined, was in an abandoned mini-golf coarse, and it depicted the vole on the bottom of the pole, and a "pterodactyl" on the top of that, and on top of the "pterodactyl", was a man wearing a strangely long "top-hat"...and i suggest, that this hat was actually concealing the elongated skull of the native American depicted, so that he could proceed with life, without any questions, regarding his skull, that was not as evolved as the average person's in his time-period( likely a resurgence of the old genes, from the ancient cross-breeding), in the case of the modern ape, i feel we are witnessing cross-breeding...between a vole, and an elephant, generating a smaller creature, with the skin of an elephant/tusks, yet having the skeletal structure of the vole( four slender limbs, with hands/feet)...thinking back to the example of the "totem pole" i viewed in Wisconsin, if my contention is correct, about the native Americans originating from hybrid gliders, then i feel that their bones might be hollow, like a birds( possibly a remnant of the gliders, in the breeding exchange/evolutionary process??)...i have no data collected regarding this notion, if i am correct, this will be found to be the case, possibly giving further indication that i am on to something here??


note--

  the little abandoned mini-golf course with the "totem pole", also had what looked to be a genuine ancient American Indian artifact, in it, being used as an obstacle, for mini-golfers on the course...a "sacred-hoop"( half-buried, standing upright), which i suggest is actually an artifact, made for early "surveyors", in Maya...a tool that i believe eventually made it's way to North America...i also feel this object was originally an Egyptian tool, to be utilized when ancient surveyors were "finding square"...a process where the hoop was tied to the waist of the surveyor, and he would then step straight forward, dragging the weight in a straight line, behind him...displaying one of the lines in the "x-y" axis, in relation to a "monolith" in the distance...or possibly, a second surveyor's "ank-staff", in ancient Egyptian times( see my earlier "surveyors post" for a better, more clear understanding, of this topic)--


 Egypt--

  i feel that the answers to each of these questions is there, due to all life springing from this region of the earth, outwards...the gliders i am suggesting that existed from cross-breeding with voles, are likely the way that the modern human structure became prevalent, across the globe...since they could easily glide to another continent, and back again, like our modern birds do, today( likely following the path of the trade-winds), spreading the human skeletal structure, throughout creation...well before others "walked-out" of Egypt...spreading the secret means to create the civilized world, that we now enjoy( see my other post regarding "surveyors", for more on this topic)--



  genetics/proof--


  to validate my theory, i feel we may need to examine prehistoric vole genetic structure, and the original genetics structures of the creatures that i believe cross-bread with the vole, to generate an evolved "hybrid-species"...meaning, that in prehistoric times, the voles genetics may have been close enough a match, for them to mate, with many, many, different species...possibly even some insects( spiders??, ants??, other creatures with pincers??), and the vole skeletal structure, as well as the dominant trait, for rapid evolutionary change...remained, no space-aliens needed...nature finds a way, where two dis-similar species become friendly, mate, and produce a "hybrid offspring"...due to the voles skeletal structure being a dominant trait...the globe adopts this model..and this genetic structure dominates creation--


what came first( the chicken or the egg??)--

  so, what before the vole??, an excellent question, one i am certain is rolling around everyone's subconscious, or better...well...i suggest that we can find a good genetic model of the issue, still "in-play", in modern times, in the form of the frog...the frog starts out as a simple cell( or "omeba"), and rapidly evolves into an "amphibian", that breaths air, and can go on land...the tail falls off, due to the adaptation of limbs, for land-use...and i believe this is the precise model involved in the generation of all life on planet earth...where micro-organisms adapted, again, and again, until a genetic modification occurred( to make going on land possible, for short periods)...generating a creature similar to a salamander( in my opinion)...that breathed through the skin, as well as from gills...and he/she stuck around awhile, eating stuff...longer and longer, until it became a "vole", and a bird, ect...ect...due to changes incurred to the species, based upon "negative environmental stimuli"...or, from an increased ability to feed/procreate...i feel at this base level of evolution, any species likely remained separate from other "variants/breeds"...due to the creatures all being from the same basic genetic family...

   another possibility is, that different strains of "omeba" all adapted to going on land( "amphibious" life), around the same time in history, and eventually, cross bread...precisely as the dinosaurs did...to produce the best "hybrid model", of each species, after they had all evolved, with different traits, to suit their natural habitat...and each evolved species, eventually cross-bred, with the vole, with it's dominant trait, for rapid evolutionary change...and it's skeletal model, with hands/feet, attached to slender limbs, that then spread across the globe, to become the prevalent species, of "homo erectus"...that rules our modern world--



a word( about aliens...)--

   i give my opinion here, regarding the possibility of life on other planets, within the universe, for modern science to inspect( "by-the-numbers")...here goes...

  if we approach the question "mathematically", i feel we can come to the immediate conclusion, that there are, indeed other worlds in the universe, with intelligent life on them, due to the simple fact, that if you, are "one-in-a-million", then there are 7,300 of you, currently on the planet...it's science, and the universe is believed to be infinite...meaning, that if the earth was in the correct spot to generate life( in relation to the sun), to allow life to spring forth on our planet, then it must have happened somewhere else in the universe, at least one other time...if not more...so, if you do not care for "extra-terrestrials", fear-not...due to the universe being infinite in size, the probability of any other life-forms( that are most-certainly out there), finding us...is completely remote, due to the closest distance that they would likely be to us, being so far away, that they would have to travel many life-times to reach us, if ever( it's a "needle in a hay-stack", with billions, and billions of straws in it)--    

     --(  p.s. : Carl Segan rocks)--



for religious scholars--

   if you believe in god, you believe he is the "all-mighty"...and that means he can do anything, to me this indicates that god must have made the earth within seven days via utilizing the humble vole, and his special genetic ability, to rapidly evolve...the question really becomes primarily about the dates, and in my opinion, this is also a "non-issue"( religiously), meaning, that "god"( god, Allah, ect...ect...depending on your faith), has clearly been kind enough to leave us some "back-history" to discover...kind-of like watching a time-lapse video, of a plant growing...except we are talking about fast-forwarding millions of years, or less??...no problem for god, so i am not troubled, and i feel no person's faith need be shaken by this discovery in the slightest..lastly, for me, the contention of religious scholars that Mr Darwin was incorrect, about the exact path of our evolution( a single species..."homo-erectus", continually evolving, due to genetic evolutionary changes, incurred from negative "environmental stimuli", that continued up until the present day)...is absolutely correct...meaning, that Darwin is in error...i suggest instead, that we are all the product of "cross-breeding", between an early being, that had a genetic gift to rapidly adapt/evolve( a little vole), and many, many, other creatures of the time-period, with similar enough genetics to produce an offspring, with favorable traits to survive any negative stimuli in their environment( a "hybrid")...so, essentially, the human form is an expression of all the dominant traits, from all the viable breeding pairs, throughout history--




  please give my best to Charles Darwin everyone, he gave it a go...

 best wishes, john kruschke--

--a prototype( gravity-drive model)--

a model--

  when i get my finances stabilized, i have decided to make a clear-plastic "prototype model"...before that, i feel i can simply draw some animation "still-lifes", and then flip the pages, like "Walt Disney" did, for "mickey mouse", and every other cartoon in history, to show the drive working in action...this should make things really, really obvious...and it's something i can afford, to show the expected rotation and movement of the balls during one cycle, of 360 degrees that the wheel travels, i am talking about 1 picture drawn for every degree that the wheel turns( 360 frames)...it shouldn't take me too long to produce, and i will post a small video clip of me flipping all 360 pages, once i finish them...i believe that a cartoon depicting the physical expected results of an actual "gravity-drive" model in operation, will make the concept much less effort to grasp--

best wishes, john kruschke...

--the trap door( for lighter weights)--

   the "trap-door"( i neglected to draw one of the "trap-doors" into the diagram, in the 6-o clock position, use your imagination to complete the diagram...i will fix it later..)-- 

  here comes the "trap-door" re-draw( found above, displaying the doors locations, and the direction that they will open...please note, they do not move/open both ways, and this key factor inhibits weight-ball travel, in the undesired direction, of counter clock-wise)...some of you examining the gravity drive may have already deciphered the location, and direction, that the "trap-door" must be situated within the drive, to produce indefinite motion, with a lighter weight of the balls...even with heavier balls, the possibility of a "re-set" of the weight-balls, is a very possible encumbrance to sustained motion, in this case of heavier weight-balls within the drive, they move less readily, and this prevents the possibility of a rapid back-movement of the balls, to the bottom of the drive, while it turns( on the up-take potion of one revolution of the drive)...my original vision for the drive was of a unit at least two stories tall, at this size, the weights required are so heavy that i feel they would resist moving rapidly, and even if the balls were to begin to "stack-up", going the wrong way, few would likely make it through the opening of the ramp, found closest to the central pivot of the drive( moving to a downward ramp, instead of rising to the top of the wheel), so, this is the area that a "trap-door" is needed, at the points where the ramps meet the center of the drive, and the balls traverse the corner, and go back down, to a different ramp...i suggest, that if the drives "trap-doors" open upwards( one trap door is needed at each point where the ramps meet the drives central pivot point), with their hinges at the points where the drives ramps contact the central pivot point, opening upwards, towards the clock-wise direction, weight-balls can move through the chutes of the "gravity drive", on the 2 o-clock through 6 o-clock positions of the wheel, at the points where the ramps intersect at the center of the wheel, but, in the positions of 7 o-clock through 11 o-clock on the drive, the weight balls can not travel in a counter clock-wise direction...and "stack-up", resulting in an imbalance of the drive...stopping it--

re-draw image coming soon( out of time at the library)--

best wishes, john kruschke...

the gravity drive schematic(found)--

   i found the schematic for the "gravity-drive"...in preparation for the loss of my little van...i might post the diagrams in case i loose everything, the diagram for the "trap-door" was missing( lost while in storage??), anyway i have my main two drawings to build one with, someday...Amen, someone was looking out for me there--  best wishes, john kruschke...

in the diagram above( my first rendering of the design)--

   the sketch above( from my facebook page), displays the "gravity-drive" ball-weights, during a single revolution...this is the first drawing i made of the concept( it has only 8 spokes/ramps, i later decided ten spokes worked better)...if we discuss this diagram, we are talking about steel balls like those found in a pinball machine...except they are 1 foot in diameter, in a wheel two stories high, that will turn once started, as long as you live...or until the bearings wear out, whichever comes first...the issue of the bearings is my secret, i am only posting this due to adverse financial conditions...also, the paper i first designed this on, is deteriorating to the point that they are not legible...i have fears society is not ready for this power source, but, i fear the loss of it entirely, or the use of it in secret, generating fortunes for men with bad intentions, much, much, more...so it's "in the open", this wheel only works due to the inertia of the many steel balls, weighing hundreds of pounds, being in motion...a smaller one with lighter balls, that are actually the size of pinball machine balls, is possible, with a secret "trap-door" i designed...sadly, this diagram has gone missing, i will post a re-draw of the "trap-door" soon, best wishes, john kruschke... p.s. : i know Germany has a copy of my design...i noticed a fragment of it in a movie, many years ago( i am a fan of the actor)...i have always wondered how it got on the silver screen, but i am grateful for the fairness of the pilferer...since they left me the original drawing...thank-you for this kindness-- best wishes, john kruschke...

my second diagram, above( this is a sketch i made after deciding on ten pokes, instead of eight)--


   This diagram( from my facebook page), displays the direction of force the balls have, during part of a single revolution...so, how much tork?? I have a calc for that on my blog...weight, and speed, are the considerations...the heavier the balls, and the wheel to hold them are, the more tork it has to resist stopping...also, this drive can be run in an underground chamber( it does not require light ,or wind, to operate)...meaning, that there is a few miles of room, straight down, in any location, to install enough "gravity-drives" to power the improvements on the property...the concept has no limits...the one i have in mind is 2 stories tall, and could turn a generator the size of a "Desoto"...forever...best wishes, john kruschke-- oh, P.S. : for those upset about my "perpetual motion concept", think of it this way...if you pass away before it stops, you won't be bothered about wondering how long it will turn, and the earth won't last forever..so, you can rest assured, it's not really "perpetual"( that was humor....be it dry)-- ha-ha... :o)

   here is another sketch i drew, describing the function of my "gravity-drive"( from my facebook page...it transfers better than directly from my instagram page...no unwanted spaces...)--

  The "gravity-drive"...naturally, everyone will say there's no such thing as "perpetual motion"...which i love, since that would mean it's safe to post this in the open, and nobody will do anything more than try and stop laughing about it...others whom really know me, will realize i am completely serious, right away, besides the fact that they would see from the diagram, that the balls above the central pivot point, are pulled close to the pivot...and the ones against the bottom of the wheel, are farthest away from the central pivot point...also, as the wheel turns, clockwise, the upper ramp with balls on it gains force, as it lies closer to a 90 degree, or "right angle" to the ground...meaning, that the leverage is enhanced at the 3 o'-clock position of the wheel, and also the 5 o'-clock position...while positions 10 through 2 o'-clock, have no tork/leverage at all( since they are close to the central pivot in the upper half of the wheel, so...we can see that this wheel is turning while unequal force is maintained, heaviest on the 2 o'-clock through 5 o'-clock positions...yes, there is a loss in tork from raising the balls on the 7 o'-clock position through the 11 o'-clock position...but, the 10 o'-clock position through the 2 o'-clock position is not in equal harmony with the opposing side of the wheel, due to gravity, and the difference in the radius of the area that the balls are pulled to, in the upper part of the wheel, in the 10 o'-clock through 2 o'-clock position...this surface area is less...compared to the surface area of the bottom of the wheel( 5 o'-clock through 7 o'-clock, on the opposite side of the wheel), and this is the reason it works...along with the fact that there is leverage to consider, at positions 5 o'-clock through 7 o'-clock, due to a longer distance that the balls lie, from the central pivot point, unlike positions 10 o'-clock through 2 o'-clock, where they are close to the central pivot point...although position 6 o'-clock( exactly), would have minimal pull adding to the wheels total tork...anyway, some folks love to brush me off, and say "no way", and that's fine, i "keep to to myself"...others do not, so...suit yourself...laugh until it hurts, or "roll it around seriously for awhile", the choice is yours...best wishes, John Kruschke

also of note--

   each spoke in the "gravity-drive" diagram above, should have seven weight balls in it, they are not displayed within the diagram, to make the concept less effort to understand...