--The "step-wells" of India--

    Here is something i posted to my instagram, and facebook, a while ago...i am posting it here for everyone's inspection at this time...here goes--


John Kruschke

January 18 via Instagram--

   I figured out something i believe India knows, yet does not want anymore...the "step-wells"...do they know that the steps generate the water at the bottom though?? I am certain they must know...but do we know?? So, i am mentioning it...the fact that the steps of the wells generate "condensation", from the shaded area of the steps, creating a "temperature-differential", that makes "condensation" collect, due to the water vapor "dropping out" of the air...and running down the steps, to collect at the bottom, is the way i believe the "step-wells" provide fresh water( it's a "distilled water generator")...some are so large, i can't believe it...the amount of distilled water we are talking about is vast...allowing water to be available in large amounts, in a place that did not drill wells, or have lakes( i feel that the "water table" is likely very, very, far underground...deeper than the bottom of any "step-wells" found in India, in fact)...


The question--

  So, could they have forgotten that there was no water at the bottom of a "step-well" the first day it's built, before the steps could fill it, from the collection of the next mornings dew, having run down the steps to the bottom?? I am starting to suspect they have...So, i am presenting the concept here, and my "nay-sayers" may attempt to prove me wrong...I believe they will discover i am correct in the process though...In my opinion, the steps make the water, from "condensation"...the same way the "channels" cut into the cliffs, in the city of Petra work, from managing a "temperature-differential", to gain "condensate"...with vast surface area, to make a little thing per-foot, amount to a lake of water at the bottom, after all the steps contribute to the pool...I wonder if they know...??


Was it "aliens"??--

   A tv show i was watching was saying it was "aliens", that made a special temple somewhere in India, it had steps on the outside, with a room below them...basically, an open area, below the steps of the temple... a cool area...I suggest that these steps were curved, on purpose ( and not "sunken" from an earthquake, coincidentally), to direct the morning "dew" collected each day, on the steps, to a small water bin...located a distance in front of the steps...I suggest, that the upward curve of the steps, at each end, induce a downward flow of "condensation", to the center of the steps, and i feel this directs the flow of "condensation", to the pool, located in front of the steps...Meaning, the pool fills each day, from the mornings "condensation" formed, on the steps...indicating that the purpose of the entire structure, is the generation of "distilled water", for survival, in an area that does not drill wells...I am reading that most of them are currently being used for garbage, to be dumped in...a practice that might possibly prove to be an unwise idea...Since the "step-wells" require none of the issues of the depth to drill a well, to be overcome, to reach the "water table"...Also, this might indicate that the people of India may have ties to the lost city of Petra??


Navitian city of Petra/"step-well" correlations--

   I have found an image of a small simple carving, of a Roman/Egyptian arch( like the "Parthonon"), with steps like those found in the "step-wells" of India, on top...Indicating, that the Navitians of Petra were utilizing the "step-well" system, long before India...In addition to this, i am seeing the same "Roman arches", stacked on top of each other, for bathing...due to my contention that these structures are also "distilled water generators", for bathing...A women could stand between the arch, on either side, and bathe, with the completely clean "distilled water", that runs off the bottom of the ceiling, at a certain time of the day, each day, due to the "temperature-differential", between the shade under the ceiling of the arch, and the hot air of the desert, surrounding it (if you look closely, the arches have a "water-channel" cut into their ceilings, to concentrate the flow of the "condensate", into a "bathing stream")...I believe this concept displays the images we see in Petra, and India, carved as statues, or other artwork, showing a happy women, standing under the archway...Depicting the act of "taking a shower"...and possibly explaining why we see carvings, and artwork, that glorifies the elephant, in India...They bathe by spraying water onto themselves, with their trunks...Indicating that the cleaning techniques of this creature may be the origins of the idea that sparked the development of the archways, to bathe with, in ancient times...

A note (about Maya)--

   I submit for the inspection of science, the notion that every set of large stairs, in all of the cultures they are found, are actually, partly, about the generation of water, from condensate...I contend that a pitcher will be found in the Mayan culture, and others, that has a strange "flat" lip, to pour from...and if this object is indeed found to exist, i believe it was used via placing the "flat" lip of the pitcher, up against one of the steps...so that water could run into it, and be taken away, when full, to be used for daily life, to survive...probably a row of pitchers, every so many steps, so that there was a large enough volume of "condensate" running down the steps, to fill the pitchers all the way.??..time will tell the tale if i am correct...or mistaken...??

Summary( "Step-wells" continued...)--


  Perhaps filling them with garbage is not wise...so they remain if there is a drought?? No rain is required for fresh water with a "step-well" system...i am hazarding a guess this is the primary reason for there being no wells drilled in ancient times...they pulled it out of the air, the same as the lost city of Petra did...with the same basic principal, being utilized on a massive scale, to provide civilization...where no water was present...if India is unaware that the steps were creating the water, i hope they choose to restore, and preserve them, all...each one was built to allow the area it was constructed in, to have more people/greater numbers...For this reason, i feel that preserving the "step-wells" could be wise...if the modern "water table" fails, from lack of rain...the old way will remain, of generating "distilled water", from "condensate", to stop a massive loss of life, from drought...

--I feel that this B.S., is good B.S., of use to start a conversation with someone thirsty, and nothing more--


Best wishes, John Kruschke--


--looks like i have to retype the whole thing, since there are some changes to the blogs posting program, it comes out a bit weird from moving it from facebook to my blog...i will fix it tomorrow...

--The lost city of Petra--

  Here is a discovery i made a few weeks ago, i am working on my book, so i have not posted it until today, i will edit it more tomorrow--

The skinny--


    John Kruschke
January 13 via Instagram

   I made an important discovery, about the Navatian people, and the lost city of "Petra"...also known as "the city of the canyon of the crescent moon", in the "Raiders of the lost ark" movie...I suggest, that the channels cut into the base of the rock, in the winding sliver of rock, where the city's most famous "monolith" is located...were not only to move water...no, they were where all of the water was coming from, in the first place...In modern society, we call it a "gutter-buddy"...meaning, the circular trench, carved into the base of the rock walls, where the air is cooler naturally, creates an area of shade, at the top of the circular "channel" cut into the stone wall, at the base, and this shade makes the "roof" area of the "channel" cooler...generating a good "temperature-differential", between the shaded "roof" of the "channel", and the air immediately outside the "channel"...that is not in the shade...and so, there is "condensate" generated, on the "roof" of the "channel", cut into the rock wall...which runs down the side of the curve of the "channel", cut into the rock, to the bottom of the "channel" (picture a letter "C", to get the idea...meaning...we have a "distilled water generator", that is a long trench, that goes to a large holding tank...the point is, the little "channels" cut into the base of the cliffs, generates the water, i suggest all of the other trenches, move the water around, for agriculture, bathing, or other domestic purposes...the key is understanding "condensation", and the fact that the "thermal-differences" in temperatures, is what creates it...once you understand the way it's naturally formed, a distilled water generator is easy to spot...

best wishes, John Kruschke--

   Below is a second post, from my facebook page, about the concept...


John Kruschke
January 13 via instagram

   Here is a diagram of the "water generator", as i feel it works, at the Navatian city of "Petra"...I believe that the covers are not to generate high pressure, but are instead, to prevent dehydration of the "condensate", that the water generator produces, pooled at the base of the "channel", cut into the cliff wall...As well as keeping dirt/dust from filling the "channel" at the bottom, hindering water flow, and allowing it to be evaporated, by heat from the sun...And this would also explain, all of the pottery found there, to move water around...I suggest, that if they sweep the entire "channel" clear, and make new covers for the base of the "channel", that the water generator will begin to provide water again...and this indicates to me, that the discovery thousands of years ago, in regards to this "distilled water generator", is the true reason that this site was chosen for a massive civilization to be erected...it has the purest water in the whole desert...from out of nowhere...could it be, this civilization was lost due to the understanding of how "condensation" works, being lost??...I feel that the covers broke, one at a time...and eventually, enough broke that the water ceased to flow from it...in fact, the system is likely so trouble-free, that i am beginning to suspect that no one knew how to make new covers, or why they even needed them, for the water generator to function, by the time the system ceased to function, from broken covers, and "channels" filled with dirt, in too many places, along the entire generator's length...Low tech is cool, it lasts a long time...if it's a secret, there is a danger of loosing the knowledge, entirely, if the system can go 800 years without any service...

Note (the proof in the pudding)--

  I believe the serrated edges on the side of the covers, of the "channels" cut into the base of the cliffs at the site, are the proof of my contentions here, about the "channels" being the source of all the water at Petra...due to the need for water to easily enter the troughs, at the bottom of the "channels", while the covers still are keeping sunlight/heat out, to prevent the collected "condensate" from evaporating...it fits...just right...In hindsight, i have to pause, and wonder, how they kept disease ridden rats/mice, or other small creatures, from dying while living in the area under the covers??

  best wishes, John Kruschke--

P.S. : i will work on this more tomorrow...i have to go to work, washing dishes...so, hi to everybody in the anthropology sector of the work-place...hope this is of use to somebody in the profession...

--The Flip-Side (Continued)--

John Kruschke

via instagram-

  This is a continuation of an earlier post of mine, on Instagram,  in regards to an old math riddle I am working on…here goes…

The “flip-side” (continued)--.

   Well, if we look at 1 flip of the coin, if the expected variance goes the other way, on the scale ( see my earlier “flip-side” post), 1 flip should have an expected variance of 0.4 , and 0.6, heads, and tails…If the expected variance model is congruent with the rest of the scale... Meaning, 0.4 and 0.6, for 1 flip of the coin…and 4, and 6, heads, or tails, at 10 flips…with 40 and 60 for 100 flips, and 400 and 600 for 1000 flips...So, does this indicate 60,000 flips heads, or 40,000 tails, at 100,000 flips??...I have my doubts... It seems good, except for the 0.4 heads, and 0.6 tails, at one flip...Meaning, it must be a whole number, of a value of at least 1…since we can not have a “partial flip”… And so, I feel that the variance should decrease exponentially, if the “expected deviation value” is small( the “range of deviation”), at low numbers of flips... Refining “expected deviation”, and not increasing the “range of expected deviation”...with larger “expected variance” values--

Summary--

   Either way, moving the scale refines the “expected deviation”... Is it 0.4 and 0.6, heads and tails at 1 flip??...Again, I feel the value must be expressed in a whole number...Indicating to me, that the numbers must go up the scale, and not down, to refine "expected variance"...Meaning, my original notion in my first post about this problem, is most likely the correct one...

Best wishes, john kruschke--   :o)

   P. S. : My phone battery just died, and I lost what I was thinking about before this post could be posted...Sadly, good work is often lost, before the notion is saved by the person working the problem…oh now I remember...Can we deduce, that if the values of heads or tails, is greater than 20 percent, out of 100, that we then know, from the data collected, that the odds of getting heads or tails, is not “50, 50”??...or “50 percent”??...and is it then instead, an un-unequal value?? ( I feel that the data collected from the study, must reflect the “expected variance” of the “percent value” assigned to the study, or, the model has a different percentile, than the assigned value in the study) ...”Roll-it-around-awhile” everybody--  

--The Flip Side--

John Kruschke

via Instagram--

  I'm working on an old probability riddle... Here goes...

The question--

  The question… is about if you flip a coin, over and over…can It always be heads?? I say, no... Yes, it's a 50, 50, percent chance, each flip…yet, If we keep flipping, I feel it can not always be heads... And I feel we can utilize a math technique I use often, to check...if we crunch the problem a new way--

The gimbals--

    I believe we can prove/disprove the 50 percent value in the problem, via increasing the number of flips, meaning, if we increase the number of flips, the 50 percent chance each flip model should remain congruent...So, if we examine 100 flips, we should likely see 42 heads, and 58 tails, or a variation of heads and tails, being more, or less, occurring...and if not... I suggest that the coin is “weighted”, more on one side... Even though the odds should be 50, 50 each flip, each time…and the numbers generated should reflect that fact, if the percentage expected is correct...to put an even finer point on it, the "range of variance" is likely between 40 and 60, for heads and tails values... And we can then flip 100 times, 100 times...to gain the "percentage of variance", per-hundred flips...as we can see, the range of expected variance is 20, heads or tails...and half of the value is 10...and this would bring the "mean" of the "curve", at an even 50 percent of the time heads, and tails... So, I suggest, that if the odds are truly "50, 50"...the numeric "percentage" of the odds, must be expressed, long term, or the value is not an accurate expression of the physical model being studied...meaning... It can't always be heads…Unless it's heads on both sides...?? So, In my opinion, At 10,000 flips, the variance should be 5,000 heads, and 5,000 tails...Unless, the original expected variance of 20, is still present... Except expressed in the ten's column of the values...Like 4,952 heads, and 4,948 tails... ?? 

The “flip-side”( summary)--

   It could be, that the variance increases??...Which is an interesting thought, if we flip ten times, we should get between 4, and 6, heads, and tails... And if we flip 100 times, we should get between 40, and 60, heads, and tails... And if we flip 1000 times, we should get between 400, and 600, heads, or tails...So, how do we deduce if my first notion, of the variance going exponentially down, with more flips, is correct??…or this last one??…With the value increasing, per-flip??

  I will post more about that another time( I’m out of free time to post with my cell-phone)…

Best wishes, john kruschke--

--the sound barrier/echo/gunshot "report"correlations--

here is some work i produced over the fourth of july holiday, due to a cool question i was asked, by a former co-worker...here goes( posted from my facebook)--

John Kruschke

July 3 at 3:27pm 

    A holiday engineering question...i had a coworker ask me a question regarding why a gun shot's report has no echo at all, while the sound of a fireworks boom produces one...i thought about it, and here is what i said...

The echo--

      I believe that an echo is a model similar to the dynamics we observe when we drop a pebble in the center of a puddle of water...the wave generated moves outward in an equal manner, from the center of "the-point-of-origin", in an equal pattern, moving from the center, outward, 360 degrees from the "point-of-origin", until it "crests", and reaches the edge of the puddle of water, at this point, the wave returns to the center of the puddle, to the "point-of-origin", and i feel that this natural model is congruent with the dynamics in play from a fireworks explosion on the forth of july...the sound wave from the explosion moves outward, from the "point-of-origin", in an equal manner, and strikes all of the objects it encounters "squarely", or "at a 90 degree angle", i suggest that this results in the sound wave being reflected directly back, in the precise direction in which it came, in each degree, of the 360 degrees from the "point-of-origin", producing an "echo"...


The gun-shot/"report"--

     I feel that the difference in results produced, from the two different physical models/actions, is essentially about the inequality of the movement of the sound waves, traveling outward, from the two actions...the gun shot produces sound from the gasses of the "report", exiting the gun's barrel, when the shot is fired...in more of a "cone-shape", that moves in the direction of the shot fired, and not equally, as we see in the "pebble-in-a-puddle" model, yes, there is some sound that moves from the side of the barrel during the gun shot, but not much, compared to the direction of the shot, and not in an equal manner, as seen in the "pebble-in-a-puddle" model...this results in the vector of the gun shot's sound wave contacting objects at an angle that does not refract/reflect the sound wave directly back in the opposite direction, back towards the "point-of-origin", and instead, the sound wave is reflected back indirectly, producing no echo...also, and mainly, the "report" of the gun shot does not travel outward from the "point-of-origin" in an equal pattern, as we see in the "pebble-in-a-puddle" model, and this means that the sound wave does not get refracted directly back to the wave's starting point, to generate an echo...lastly, the bullet fired sometimes breaks the speed of sound, and i feel that this must be considered, due to the action of the sound barrier being broken producing a sound, leading me to speculate on the precise dynamics "in-play" when the sound barrier is broken...


The sound barrier--

      I suggest that the sound we hear when the sound barrier is breached, is readily seen in nascar racing, and a few automotive commercials...here goes...

     In the car commercials most of us have seen on television, the low-speed stream of smoke in the wind-tunnel, goes over the cars contours very closely, displaying the cars "drag", or "air-foil" , very well, and i suggest, that this physical model is simply expressing the phenomenon ongoing with "drag", and "drafting", in nascar racing, and also the sound barrier...in nascar racing, at speeds above 150 mph, all nascar drivers know, that the air that contacts the front windshield, moves over the roof, and then passes mostly straight backwards, and does not follow the contours of the race car very closely, there is some pressure exerted against the trunk, and the rear fin of the car, adding downward force, to the rear-end of the vehicle, and the faster you go, the more pressure is generated against the trunk lid, from the air-stream of the air moving around the car's contour, moving "tighter", or more closely, to the body of the car, following the shape of the car, more forcefully, and closer...i believe this known concept is the key to understanding the sound barrier, and why it produces a sound when breached, as well as why there is not a second "sonic-boom", and why airplanes fly faster after the speed of sound is breached, with less effort, exerted by the engines to do so...

The skinny--

    I suggest, that an airplane is a congruent model, both to the auto commercial, and the race car, the speed being traveled is merely much greater, and, this increased speed, increases the pressures of air, both against the contours of the hull of the craft, and also to the "draft pocket", that is also present behind a race car...allowing a competing car, traveling directly behind it, to travel faster, without using the power of the engine very much...essentially, the lead nascar racer has a "vacuum" behind it, and this limits the speed of the lead car, due to this "vacuum" acting on the rear of the car, slowing it( while the driver traveling a few feet behind, is not slowed, resulting in extra power to pass the lead car, from the engine doing less work, to maintain the speed, with less gas expended to do so)...i believe that this dynamic is also "in play", while an airplane flies, and i suggest, that the pocket of negative air pressure( "draft pocket"), located directly behind an airplanes wings, and tail, get more, and more, pressure from the air-stream of the jet, until the air moving around the top of the plane, and the air moving across the bottom of the fuselage, slam together, after the craft's "draft-pocket" collapses...popping, like a piece of "bubble-wrap", and making a huge "sonic boom", this concept describes/represents the air-stream of the air moving around the planes exterior, being so tight to the fuselage, that there is no longer a "draft-pocket" behind the airplanes wings, and tail, since the air-foil of the plane is too close to the exterior of the plane, and as a result, there is no "vacuum" acting on the trailing surfaces of the craft, slowing it, from the negative pressure within the "draft-pocket", essentially "sucking" the plane backwards, and reducing the effectiveness of the engines thrust...meaning...once the air-stream of the air passing over the plane has been pulled this close to the body of the craft( from increased speed), and the "draft pocket" has collapsed, there can be no further "sonic booms" produced, and the aircraft may speed up above mock-1, unencumbered by the "drag"of the airplane's "drag-pocket", after it has collapsed...lastly, i feel that we must examine the shape of, and true natural reasons for, the "draft-pocket" to exist at all--

The draft pocket--

     I feel that the "draft pocket" is best physically described, and displayed, by examining the air movement, and shape, of a hot air balloon...cold air enters the opening, above the basket, at the rim, and warm air comes out of the direct center of the opening, acting like a rudimentary jet engine, that works based upon the "venturi shape" of the balloon, and the cold air( lesser concentration of molecular collisions per-sec), attempting to equalize in temp, with the hot air trapped inside the balloon( with a greater concentration of molecular collisions per-sec), so, again...i believe that the cold air outside the balloon, moves into the balloon at the rim of the balloon's opening, then it increases in speed, from encountering the curve/vector of the balloon's "neck", or "venturi", where it mixes with the air at the "bulb", or top, of the balloon, forcing some of the air out of the center of the balloons opening, above the basket...and, if we view this physical model, working on it's side, directly behind an airplane's tail, and wings, i believe we will have an accurate description of the "draft pocket", in action...i suggest that the speed of the air rushing by the tail( but not perfectly close to the tails' surfaces), allows an "air-pocket" to exist directly behind the tail...air is drawn away from this area, to mix with the air-stream that is coming from above, and below, the airplane, streaming off the tail of the craft...i feel that this motion of air, is best described as air moving in, towards the tail, and then turning abruptly around, and going the opposite way, to join with the "jet-wash" of the aircraft...in the same manner as a hot air balloon's air movement does( inverted, with air entering at the center, and exiting at the rim)..in this case, of the aircraft's "draft-pocket", i feel that the key concept to grasp, is in relation to a nascar racer's rear spoiler, and trunk-lid...if we view the aircraft's "draft-pocket", as an extension of a race car's trunk-lid, we will readily see that the "draft-pocket" is also incurring more, and more, pressure, like the trunk-lid of the race car does...and i feel that this dynamic forces the "neck" of the "balloon shape" of the "draft-pocket" to narrow, more, and more, until the "neck" of the "draft-pocket" is forced closed...and at this time, we have arrived at the critical speed/moment, when any additional air pressure from the "jet-wash" of the aircraft, ruptures the sealed "draft-pocket", of negative air pressure( located directly behind the airplane's wings/tail)...and BOOM...the craft has broken the sound barrier...way to go Chuck...history is made( i believe that this concept readily describes the true reason Mr Yeager experienced mild/major buffeting of his "elevators", during his flight, due to a "draft-pocket" being directly behind each of his wings, that became massively turbulent, right before he breached the barrier, resulting in his "elevators" "wagging", like the tail of a dog, sending reverse control movements back through his aircraft's control rods, to the "stick", or wheel--

    i feel that this B.S., is good B.S., of use for scientists, and airmen, to speculate about...and nothing more...

best wishes, john kruschke--

--The "Roman numerals"( i have reclaimed the system)--

  I am forced to use public wifi at the moment, and a few of my posts have gone missing( i had to reclaim some work off my Facebook page, that was removed from my computer), and i have to rewrite my "comets ice-tail" post, which i feel was erased while i was at a coffee shop, in Minnesota, before i moved away from there( i had my "config-system files" removed through the same coffee shop's wifi, a few times...and it was expensive to have fixed)...

  So, hackers, and information thieves beware...stealing the interior of authors books is not wise, or welcome...a piece of writing is like a painting, a critic in the field will know, immediately, that an article was written by "Steven king", or another author...stealing it, and uploading it to a copy write website, will not work, and you will be looking foolish, at the very least...also, really...what are the odds two people came up with the same answers, to a mystery that has baffled science, for over 1000 years, in the same decade??...zero, less than zero (0.09??)...or, at the very least, it's an "integer"...hope you enjoy the "Roman numerals", and to whomever has my "comets ice-tail thermodynamics post", i will get it back, and if you had it copy written already, so what...every literary critic in the world, will know it's mine, halfway through reading it( besides, thieves are often lazy, and if you copied it off my computer, you probably sent the stolen work to the copywriter written with my "MS Word" program...that's registered to me...and the program has the time, and the name of the person the "MS Word" is registered to (myself), embedded in the programming of the file you stole...so, there is proof you stole it--


Back to science...

  I got this one while i was sitting in front of an old clock, that was mounted above the street in Colorado springs...it had "Roman numerals" on it, instead of our modern numeric system, i feel i have it completely deciphered, correctly...i believe the current thinking about the "Roman numerals" is incorrect...so, i present it below (my way), for the inspection of science, i feel we may gain some knowledge that was lost, in regards to building structures that bear enormous loads, to support their own weight (i suggest that the Egyptians, Romans, Greeks, Spartans, and Trojans, all were building with the same math tools, that came from Egypt...i suggest, that they likely derived the weight of the roof of a structure, via weighing a square block of the stone to be used, or other material (wood, ect...)...something called a "cubit", and then added all the stones that would fit in the volume of the roof together, to get the "total weight" that would bear on all sides of the roof...the "total load", in "cubits"...after this value was known, i feel that the engineers simply divided the "total load" of the roof, by the number of the columns that they were sent, to support the structure...via adding all of the numeric values that would have been inscribed on each column, together, to show the "load capacity" of all of the columns working together...once the numeric value of all of the columns was greater than the "total load" of the roof in "cubits", they knew how many columns to use...meaning, if you have columns that all have "X"(10), written on them, and your roof"s "total load", is 100, you add columns together, until you get a numeric value above 100, and then evenly space the columns around the perimeter of the roof, and you will then know, that the building is sound..."by-the-numbers"...if my belief is correct, about this system of building, every column in Roman architecture, will have a "Roman numeral" inscribed on it...as well as the Egyptian, Greek, Spartan, and Trojan columns...



  Here are the "Roman numerals" i have deciphered, so far, that will be in the interior of my next book, i have only counted to 800 or so, with the system, i will eventually count to a "phalanx" (the Roman value for a "company" of soldiers)...i believe that the Roman's system, was the birth of modern addition, and subtraction, due to the Romans utilizing the value of a "phalanx" as the "finite number", in their system of addition...meaning, once the value they were counting to reached a "phalanx", they simply started counting all over again, from 1...and marked this second value, below the first value( a "phalanx")...and then added them together, to get the "total", without utilizing an incredibly long number, since i believe you can count much higher than a "phalanx", with the "Roman numeric system", but, the numbers generated are so long, that writing them on papyrus, or stone, would be tedious, and hard to read...with very much space required to inscribe them...

                                                              --ROMAN MATH--

The "Roman numeral system"( explained)--

    I had an epiphany a few minutes ago, about the "Roman numerals", that i wanted to save...i saw a clock above the street, with “Roman numerals”, instead of “regular” numbers on it today, and i figured out their system, right then, due to my work on their “surveying system”, that i feel they were using in the "Roman time-period"...the "Roman numerals" are deciphered below, into "regular "numbers( my way differs from the popular "scientific opinion" though)--

1  = I

2 =  II

3 = III

4 =  IV  <<---this is the first key to the system...a capitol "i" ( the symbol for the number 1), is put before the symbol for 5( a capitol "V")...and this indicates that you subtract, the value of 1, from the value 5...due to a symbol for 1, before the symbol for 5, means you subtract the value before the symbol for 5, from the value of 5...and this is the first key to the system, meaning...IV  is the "Roman numeral" for the number 4....

V =  5

VI = 6    this is the second key to reading "Roman numerals"...if the symbol for 1( a capitol "I"), is after the symbol for 5( a capitol "V"), then the value of however many capitol "I" symbols, that are after the symbol for the number 5( "V")...are then added to the value of 5( "V")...to indicate a value of 6( "VI")--

VII = 7

VIII =  8

IX = 9  this is the third key to the "Roman numeral system"...the capitol letter "X" indicates a value of 10...and the capitol letter "I" before the symbol for 10( "X"), indicates that we must subtract the value of 1( "I"), that is before the symbol for 10( "X")...meaning...1 - 10 = 9( "IX" )...

X = 10

XI = 11   this is the fourth key to reading "Roman numerals"...the value of 1 ( "I"), after the symbol for 10( "X"), is added to the value of 10( "X")...meaning...10 + 1 = 11( "XI")...indicating 11--

XII = 12  this is as far as the clock went, in "Roman numerals"...i feel i can derive the rest, from this many numbers on the dial...the clock may have been a way for the average person, to learn, and retain, the "Roman numeral system", for the future generations of Romans--

XIII = 13

XIV = 14  this is another key to the system i am theorizing is correct...the symbol for 10( "X"), is in front of the symbol for 4( "IV"), indicating that we add the value of 4("IV") to the value of ten( "X")...to get 10 + 4 = 14( "XIV")--

XV = 15

XVI = 16  here is another key to reading the "Roman numerals"...the same as before, we add the value of 1 ("I") that is found after the symbols for 15("XV")...indicating that we add 1 to 15, to get 16("XVI")--

XVII = 17

XVIII = 18   here is another key to reading "Roman numerals"....there is never more than three capitol "I" symbols, after a value(3), instead, the symbol for 5("V"), or the symbol for 10( "X")...is used before the symbol "I", to display 1...this way is used, instead of having more than three capital "I" symbols( 1+1+1+1...since the symbol for 4, is "IV")--

XIX = 19  this is another key to reading the "Roman numerals"...only one symbol, for the number 1( "I"), will be put in front of the symbol for 5( "V"), and the symbol for 10("X")...to indicate you must subtract 1, from 10, to get 9...seen as "10 + 9(1 - 10) = 19

XX = 20

XXI = 21

XXII = 22

XXIII = 23

XXIV = 24

XXV = 25

XXVI =  26

XXVII =  27

XXVIII =  28

XXIX = 29    at this point, the system repeats, again, and again, we only need to put a second "X" symbol, in front of the second digit of the number we are writing, in the "Roman numeral system", to indicate "29"( XXIX)...instead of 19( XIX)...

XXX = 30

XXXI = 31

XXXII = 32

XXXIII = 33

XXXIV = 34

XXXV = 35

XXXVI = 36

XXXVII = 37

XXXVIII = 38

XXXIX = 39

XL = 40  here is another “tough spot” in the "Roman numeral system"…after three symbols are displayed, that are the same symbol…an “I”( indicating 1), or a “X”( indicating 10), a new symbol must be utilized, in the "Roman numeral system"…in this case, modern science contends that an “L”( indicating the value of "fifty"), must be deployed, after three “X” symbols are already in use( since there can not be 4 “X” symbols in a row)…and so, we must subtract 10 from 50, to get 40( meaning, an “X” before the “L”, indicates that we must subtract the left value from the right value, to get 40…I do not agree, this suggested way is far to “choppy”, with huge “jumps” in the system, that are not “linear”…making the system hard to read…I suggest instead, that no value higher than “I”( 1), is ever put to the left of another value, to be subtracted, in the "Roman numeral system"…my theory, regarding continued counting, with the "Roman numeral system", above this numeric value, are below, for everyone's inspection--

Note--

  I have a difference of opinion about the way the "Roman numerals" should go, after this point…I suggest that there is never a value grater than “I”(  1 in our modern counting system), before the second value in the number being expressed, to be subtracted( as mentioned in the above paragraph), so…I believe 40 should be an “L” symbol, in the "Roman numeral system", instead of 50…so that the system can continue, in an orderly fashion, as before…see below for examples--

LI = 41

LII = 42

LIII = 43

LIV = 44

LV = 45

LVI = 46

LVII = 47

LVIII = 48

LIX = 49

LX = 50    this is a continuation of the system, and seems natural…we add the left value, ”L”( 40), to the “X” value(10)…to get 50( “LX”)…

LXI = 51

LXII =52

LXIII = 53

LXIV = 54

LXV = 55

LXVI = 56

LXVII = 57

LXVIII = 58

LXIX =59

LXX = 60  here we see a deviation of the numbers again, in my opinion, based upon the repetition of the earlier numbers i was able to derive, up until the number thirty…the system must repeat, in ”threes”…meaning, an “L”, for "forty", must be deployed, with no more than three “X” symbols( 10) after it, until you reach 70, also of note, an ”I” symbol(1), before another symbol, besides “I”(1)…indicates you must subtract 1 from the value after it…if there is an “I” symbol( 1), after another “I” symbol( 1), you must add the two together, to get “2”…

LXXI = 61

LXXII = 62

LXXIII = 63

LXXIV = 64

LXXV = 65

LXXVI = 66

LXXVII = 67

LXXVIII = 68

LXXIX = 69

LXXX = 70

LXXXI = 71

LXXXII = 72

LXXXIII = 73

LXXXIV = 74

LXXXV = 75

LXXXVI = 76

LXXXVII = 77

LXXXVIII = 78

LXXXIX = 79  here we see the system naturally repeating, as it should, where we must have another symbol, in front of 40, and I suggest we must deploy another “L”( 40), in front of the symbol ”L”( 40)…to indicate 40 + 40 = 80(“LL”)…

LL = 80

LLI = 81

LLII = 82

LLIII = 83

LLIV = 84

LLV = 85

LLVI = 86

LLVII = 87

LLVIII = 88

LLIX = 89

LLX = 90

LLXI = 91

LLXII = 92

LLXIII = 93

LLXIV = 94

LLXV = 95

LLXVI = 96

LLXVII = 97

LLXVIII = 98

LLXIX = 99

C = 100   here, the modern interpretation of the system deviates from my beliefs, about this way of counting( "Roman numerals"), due to "popular scientific opinion", suggesting that “C” is the value of 100, in our modern system of counting, this may be almost right…although, in my opinion, the system could continue quite nicely, in the previous way i was suggesting the "Roman numeric system" works, via adding another “X” symbol( 10), after “LLX”(90), to get “LLXX = 100), and this would allow the system to continue naturally, until we reached “LLXXXIX = 40+40+10+10+10+9(1-10) = 119…afterward, we would need to add another “L” symbol(40)…to get “LLL = 120”…and the system could repeat, until we reach “LLLXXXIX = 40+40+40+10+10+10+9(1-10) = 159…requiring a new symbol again, for 160…see below

LLXX = 100

LLXXI = 101

LLXXII = 102

LLXXIII = 103

LLXXIV = 104

LLXXV = 105

LLXXVI = 106

LLXXVII = 107

LLXXVIII = 108

LLXXIX = 109

LLXXX = 110

LLXXXI = 111

LLXXXII = 112

LLXXXIII = 113

LLXXXIV = 114

LLXXXV = 115

LLXXXVI = 116

LLXXXVII = 117

LLXXXVIII = 118

LLXXXIX = 119

LLL = 120    here we see another situation where we are about to require a new "Roman numeral", after we have exhausted the possibilities of the "Roman numeral" “L”…and we must go to the value “C” after we reach “LLLXXXIX”…in the "Roman numeral system"( “C” is for the hundredths values, in the "Roman numeric system")--

LLLI = 121

LLLII = 122

LLLIII = 123

LLLIV = 124

LLLV = 125

LLLVI = 126

LLLVII = 127

LLLVIII = 128

LLLIX = 129

LLLX = 130

LLLXI = 131

LLLXII = 132

LLLXIII = 133

LLLXIV = 134

LLLXV = 135

LLLXVI = 136

LLLXVII = 137

LLLXVIII = 138

LLLXIX = 139

LLLXX = 140

LLLXXI = 141

LLLXXII = 142

LLLXXIII = 143

LLLXXIV = 144

LLLXXV = 145

LLLXXVI = 146

LLLXXVII = 147

LLLXXVIII = 148

LLLXXIX = 149

LLLXXX = 150

LLLXXXI = 151

LLLXXXII = 152

LLLXXXIII = 153

LLLXXXIV = 154

LLLXXXV = 155

LLLXXXVI = 156

LLLXXXVII = 157

LLLXXXVIII = 158

LLLXXXIX = 159

C = 160    here we have expended the possibilities of the value “L”…as mentioned above, we must go to a new "Roman numeral", to indicate a value of 160( “C”)…

CI = 161

CII = 162

CIII = 163

CIV = 164

CV = 165

CVI = 166

CVII = 167

CVIII = 168

CIX = 169

CX  =  170

CXI = 171

CXII = 172

CXIII = 173

CXIV = 174

CXV = 175

CXVI = 176

CXVII = 177

CXVIII = 178

CXIX = 179

CXX = 180

  So, we see that the future number where we expend the possibilities of the value “C” , in "Roman numerals", is “ 160+160+160+10+10+10+9(1-10) = 519 or…”CCCXXXIX”(519), in "Roman numerals"….and we must go to the next "Roman numeral", for numbers above 519(“D”)…

CCCXXXIX = 519

D = 520

DI = 521

DII = 522

   Now we see the system repeating itself again, as before…and we can deduce, that the value “D” in "Roman numerals" will be exhausted, when we reach the value of “DDDXXXIX”( 520+520+520+10+10+10+9(1-10) = 1599 , at this time, we must go to the next "Roman numeral", to indicate a value of 1600( “M”)…and the system continues, again--

M = 1600

MI = 1601

MII = 1603

Again the system repeats itself, until the value of “M” is exhausted…at the value of “MMMXXXIX”( 1600+1600+1600+10+10+10+9(1-10) = 4839 , at this point, we can add an “L”( 40), and continue counting higher, although I doubt that the "Roman numerals" continue on, higher and higher, similar to our modern system of counting, instead, i believe this is as far as the Romans really needed to count, I suggest they simply began counting again, from 1(“I”), after reaching a “phalanx”)…up until they reached 4839 again, and then simply said that they had “two groups of 4839”…and this could be written simply, via putting “MMMXXXIX” directly below another “MMMXXXIX”…to indicate that the two must be added together…see below--

MMMXXXIX

MMMXXXIX 

____________

      9678            

   Displayed in modern numbers as….1600+1600+1600+1600+1600+1600+10+10+10+10+10+10+9( 1-10) +9( 1-10) = 9678  and it’s that simple, after “MMMXXXIX”, where i feel the "Roman numeral system" ends…you can just put the next value to be added, directly below the “final value” of “MMMXXXIX”( 4839)…and get a value above 9678, meaning…4840 in "Roman numerals" would be as follows, below( I believe this to be the origin of our modern system of addition, and subtraction, where one value is placed below the other, to solve the problem)…

MMMXXXIX

I =

____________

4840               

  And at this point, the "Roman numeral system" can repeat itself, from the beginning, and be added to the previous “final value” of “MMMXXXIX”( 4839)…over, and over again…into infinity, and even farther than that--

Summary--

  I believe this way is correct, where the system repeats…so it’s easy to understand, and read…instead of having so many leaps in subtraction( like the "modern scientific opinion" suggests, where they mix the "Roman symbols", in the "Roman numeric system"…”LCM” is an example, that i feel is an error…)…so, again…I feel that it’s important in the system that an “I” symbol, put before any other symbol, besides another “I” symbol(1)…indicates that you must subtract the value of “I”(1), from the value to the right of it…always…if we subtract 10(“X”), from the symbol for a number to the right of it(“L”,”C”,”M”…ect…), the system gets too complicated to read, when displaying larger numbers…and it just doesn’t work( for more about the "Roman numerals", and to see me display counting all the way to 4839, see my blog digitaldoodlesandmind-farts.blogspot.com/ and read my “Roman numerals post”--

                                                  ---The "Roman numerals" above 180---


   Here are the remaining numbers i have deciphered...up until around 800...

The "Roman numerals"( continued)--

   Here are some of the remaining "Roman numerals", of the "Roman numeric system", decoded for everyone to inspect…the first portion of the system is in my upcoming book, “digital doodles and mind-farts”…and it will be out soon, I am saving time by not adding this important first portion of the system( 1-180)…I will post the first 180 decoded "numerals" soon…enjoy--

CXXI = 181

CXXII = 182

CXXIII = 183

CXXIV = `184

CXXV = 185

CXXVI = 186

CXXVII = 187

CXXVIII = 188

CXXIX = 189

CXXX = 190

CXXXI = 191

CXXXII = 192

CXXXIII = 193

CXXXIV = 194

CXXXV = 195

CXXXVI = 196

CXXXVII = 197

CXXXVIII = 198

CXXXIX = 199

CL = 200    Here is the other main key to counting with "Roman numerals"…we must add 40(“L”), to the symbol for 160(“C”) to get 200(“CL”)…and this concept is the way we must count, above this number, in the "Roman numeral system"…

CLI = 201

CLII = 202

CLIII = 203

CLIV = 204

CLV = 205

CLVI = 206

CLVII = 207

CLVIII = 208

CLIX = 209

CLX = 210

CLXI = 211

CLXII = 212

CLXIII = 213

CLXIV = 214

CLXV = 215

CLXVI = 216

CLXVII = 217

CLXVIII = 218

CLXIX = 219

CLXX = 220

CLXXI = 221

CLXXII = 222

CLXXIII = 223

CLXXIV = 224

CLXXV = 225

CLXXVI = 226

CLXXVII = 227

CLXXVIII = 228

CLXXIX = 229

CLXXX = 230

CLXXXI = 231

CLXXXII = 232

CLXXXIII = 233
CLXXXIV = 234

CLXXXV = 235

CLXXXVI = 236

CLXXXVII = 237

CLXXXVIII = 238

CLXXXIX = 239

CLL = 240

CLLI = 241

CLLII = 242

CLLIII = 243

CLLIV = 244

CLLV = 245

CLLVI = 246

CLLVII = 247

CLLVIII = 248

CLLIX = 249

CLLX = 250

CLLXI = 251

CLLXII = 252

CLLXIII = 253

CLLXIV = 254

CLLXV = 255

CLLXVI = 256

CLLXVII = 257

CLLXVIII = 258

CLLXIX = 259

CLLXX = 260

CLLXXI = 261

CLLXXII = 262

CLLXXIII = 263

CLLXXIV = 264

CLLXXV = 265

CLLXXVI = 266

CLLXXVII = 267

CLLXXVIII = 268

CLLXXIX = 269

CLLXXX = 270

CLLXXXI = 271

CLLXXXII = 272

CLLXXXIII = 273

CLLXXXIV = 274

CLLXXXV = 275

CLLXXXVI = 276

CLLXXXVII = 277

CLLXXXVIII = 278

CLLXXXIX = 279

CLLL = 280

CLLLI = 281   Here we see another important key to reading "Roman numerals"…we are about to expend the “L” symbol(40)…for use when going above 200, the system is always in threes, once three "Roman numeric symbols" are expressed, with  9(“IX”), afterward…the next "Roman symbol", of a higher value, must be deployed, to continue counting higher--

CLLLII = 282

CLLLIII = 283

CLLLIV = 284

CLLLV = 285

CLLLVI = 286

CLLLVII = 287

CLLLVIII = 288

CLLLIX = 289

CLLLX = 290

CLLLXI = 291

CLLLXII = 292

CLLLXIII = 293

CLLLXIV = 294

CLLLXV = 295

CLLLXVI = 296

CLLLXVII = 297

CLLLXVIII = 298

CLLLXIX = 299

CLLLXX = 300

CLLLXXI = 301

CLLLXXII = 302

CLLLXXIII = 303

CLLLXXIV = 304

CLLLXXV = 305

CLLLXXVI = 306

CLLLXXVII = 307

CLLLXXVIII = 308

CLLLXXIX = 309

CLLLXXX = 310

CLLLXXXI = 311

CLLLXXXII = 312

CLLLXXXIII = 313

CLLLXXXIV = 314

CLLLXXXV = 315

CLLLXXXVI = 316

CLLLXXXVII = 317

CLLLXXXVIII = 318

CLLLXXXIX = 319

CC = 320

CCI = 321

CCII = 322

CCIII = 323

CCIV = 324

CCV = 325

CCVI = 326

CCVII = 327

CCVIII = 328

CCIX = 329

CCX = 330

CCXI = 331

CCXII = 332

CCXIII = 333

CCXIV = 334

CCXV = 335

CCXVI = 336

CCXVII = 337

CCXVIII = 338

CCXIX = 339

CCXX = 340

CCXXI = 341

CCXXII = 342

CCXXIII = 343

CCXXIV = 344

CCXXV = 345

CCXXVI = 346

CCXXVII = 347

CCXXVIII = 348

CCXXIX = 349

CCXXX = 350

CCXXXI = 351

CCXXXII = 352

CCXXXIII = 353

CCXXXIV = 354

CCXXXV = 355

CCXXXVI = 356

CCXXXVII = 357

CCXXXVIII = 358

CCXXXIX = 359

CCL = 360            Here is another important key to reading "Roman numerals"…we must deploy the "Roman numeral" “L”(40), as seen earlier, when there was only  1 “C” symbol(160)…where we added 40(“L”)…to get 200(“CL”)…so, we see the system repeating itself again, in a predictable manner, so it’s easy to read( this particular "Roman numeral" should be common in Roman math, due to 360 being the value of a circle, in "degrees")…

CCLI = 361

CCLII = 362

CCLIII = 363

CCLIV – 364

CCLV = 365

CCLVI = 366

CCLVII = 367

CCLVIII = 368

CCLIX = 369

CCLX = 370

CCLXI = 371

CCLXII = 372

CCLXIII = 373

CCLXIV = 374

CCLXV = 375

CCLXVI = 376

CCLXVII = 377

CCLXVIII – 378

CCLXIX = 379

CCLXX = 380

CCLXXI = 381

CCLXXII = 382

CCLXXIII = 383

CCLXXIV = 384

CCLXXV = 385

CCLXXVI = 386

CCLXXVII = 387

CCLXXVIII = 388

CCLXXIX = 389

CCLXXX = 390

CCLXXXI = 391

CCLXXXII = 392

CCLXXXIII = 393

CCLXXXIV = 394

CCLXXXV = 395

CCLXXXVI = 396

CCLXXXVII = 397

CCLXXXVIII = 398

CCLXXXIX = 399

CCLL = 400

CCLLI = 401

CCLLII = 402

CCLLIII = 403

CCLLIV = 404

CCLLV = 405

CCLLVI = 406

CCLLVII = 407

CCLLVIII = 408

CCLLIX = 409

CCLLX  = 410

CCLLXI = 411

CCLLXII = 412

CCLLXIII = 413

CCLLXIV = 414

CCLLXV = 415
CCLLXVI = 416

CCLLXVII = 417

CCLLXVIII = 418

CCLLXIX = 419

CCLLXX = 420

CCLLXXI = 421

CCLLXXII = 422

CCLLXXIII = 423

CCLLXXIV = 424

CCLLXXV = 425

CCLLXXVI = 426

CCLLXXVII = 427

CCLLXXVIII = 428

CCLLXXIX = 429

CCLLXXX = 430

CCLLXXXI = 431

CCLLXXXII = 432

CCLLXXXIII = 433

CCLLXXXIV = 434

CCLLXXXV = 435

CCLLXXXVI = 436

CCLLXXXVII = 437

CCLLXXXVIII = 438

CCLLXXXIX = 439

CCLLL = 440

CCLLLI = 441

CCLLLII = 442

CCLLLIII = 443

CCLLLIV = 444

CCLLLV = 445

CCLLLVI = 446

CCLLLVII = 447

CCLLLVIII = 448

CCLLLIX = 449

CCLLLX = 450

CCLLLXI = 451

CCLLLXII = 452

CCLLLXIII = 453

CCLLLXIV = 454

CCLLLXV = 455

CCLLLXVI = 456

CCLLLXVII = 457

CCLLLXVIII = 458

CCLLLXIX = 459

CCLLLXX = 460

CCLLLXXI = 461

CCLLLXXII = 462

CCLLLXXIII = 463

CCLLLXXIV = 464

CCLLLXXV = 465

CCLLLXXVI = 466

CCLLLXXVII = 467

CCLLLXXVIII = 468

CCLLLXXIX = 469

CCLLLXXX = 470

CCLLLXXXI = 471

CCLLLXXXII = 472

CCLLLXXXIII = 473

CCLLLXXXIV = 474

CCLLLXXXV = 475

CCLLLXXXVI = 476

CCLLLXXXVII = 477

CCLLLXXXVIII = 478

CCLLLXXXIX = 479

CCC = 480                       Here we see the value of “C”(160), repeated 3 times…to indicate a value of “160+160+160 = 480(“CCC”)…and the system repeats again, as before…"ad nauzeum"…

CCCI = 481

CCCII = 482

CCCIII = 483

CCCIV = 484

CCCV = 485

CCCVI = 486

CCCVII = 487

CCCVIII = 488

CCCIX = 489

CCCX = 490

CCCXI = 491

CCCXII = 492

CCCXIII = 493

CCCXIV = 494

CCCXV = 495

CCCXVI = 496

CCCXVII = 497

CCCXVIII = 498

CCCXIX =499

CCCXX = 500

CCCXXI = 501

CCCXXII = 502

CCCXXIII = 503

CCCXXIV = 504

CCCXXV = 505

CCCXXVI = 506

CCCXXVII = 507

CCCXXVIII = 508

CCCXXIX = 509

CCCXXX = 510

CCCXXXI = 511

CCCXXXII = 512

CCCXXXIII = 513

CCCXXXIV = 514

CCCXXXV = 515

CCCXXXVI = 516

CCCXXXVII = 517

CCCXXXVIII = 518

CCCXXXIX = 519

D = 520                     Here we see the point where we must move to the next higher symbol, in the "Roman numeral system", “D”(520)…and then the system may continue as before, with “D”(520), as the first symbol in the number, with the system repeating as before, in all other respects--

DI = 521

DII = 522

DIII = 523

DIV = 524

DV = 525

DVI = 526

DVII = 527

DVIII = 528

DIX – 529

DX =530

DXI = 531

DXII = 532

DXIII = 533

DXIV = 534

DXV = 535

DXVI = 536

DXVII = 537

DXVIII = 538

DXIX = 539

DXX = 540

DXXI = 541

DXXII = 542

DXXIII = 543

DXXIV = 544

DXXV = 545

DXXVI = 546

DXXVII = 547

DXXVIII = 548

DXXIX = 549

DXXX = 550

DXXXI = 551

DXXXII = 552

DXXXIII = 553

DXXXIV = 554

DXXXV = 555

DXXXVI = 556

DXXXVII = 557

DXXXVIII = 558

DXXXIX = 559

DL = 560                Here we see the need to go to the next highest value, above “X”(10), in the "Roman numeric system"…which is “L”(40)…and then we may proceed, as before--

DLI = 561

DLII = 562

DLIII = 563

DLIV = 564

DLV = 565

DLVI = 566

DLVII = 567

DLVIII =568

DLIX = 569

DLX = 570

DLXI = 571

DLXII = 572

DLXIII = 573

DLXIV = 574

DLXV = 575

DLXVI = 576

DLXVII = 577

DLXVIII = 578

DLXIX = 579

DLXX = 580

DLXXI = 581

DLXXII = 582

DLXXIII= 583

DLXXIV = 584

DLXXV = 585

DLXXVI = 586

DLXXVII = 587

DLXXVIII = 588

DLXXIX = 589

DLXXX = 590

DLXXXI = 591

DLXXXII = 592

DLXXXIII = 593

DLXXXIV = 594

DLXXXV = 595

DLXXXVI = 596

DLXXXVII = 597

DLXXXVIII = 598

DLXXXIX = 599

DLL = 600

DLLI = 601

DLLII = 602

DLLIII = 603

DLLIV = 604

DLLV = 605

DLLVI = 606

DLLVII = 607

DLLVIII = 608

DLLIX = 609

DLLX = 610

DLLXI = 611

DLLXII = 612

DLLXIII = 613

DLLXIV = 614

DLLXV = 615

DLLXVI = 616

DLLXVII = 617

DLLXVIII = 618

DLLXIX = 619

DLLXX = 620

DLLXXI = 621

DLLXXII = 622

DLLXXIII = 623

DLLXXIV = 624

DLLXXV = 625

DLLXXVI = 626

DLLXXVII = 627

DLLXXVIII = 628

DLLXXIX = 629

DLLXXX = 630

DLLXXXI = 631

DLLXXXII = 632
DLLXXXIII = 633

DLLXXXIV = 634

DLLXXXV = 635

DLLXXXVI = 636

DLLXXXVII = 637

DLLXXXVIII = 638

DLLXXXIX = 639

DLLL = 640             Here we see the "Roman numerals" adding up…"520 + 40 + 40 + 40 = 640"(“D”+”L”+”L”+”L” = 640 )…

DLLLI = 641

DLLLII = 642

DLLLIII = 643

DLLLIV = 644

DLLLV= 645

DLLLVI = 646

DLLLVII = 647

DLLLVIII = 648

DLLLIX = 649

DLLLX = 650

DLLLXI = 651

DLLLXII = 652

DLLLXIII = 653

DLLLXIV = 654

DLLLXV = 655

DLLLXVI = 656

DLLLXVII = 657

DLLLXVIII = 658

DLLLXIX = 659

DLLLXX = 660

DLLLXXI = 661

DLLLXXII = 662

DLLLXXIII = 663

DLLLXXIV = 664

DLLLXXV = 665

DLLLXXVI = 666

DLLLXXVII = 667

DLLLXXVIII = 668

DLLLXXIX = 669

DLLLXXX = 670
DLLLXXXI = 671

DLLLXXXII = 672

DLLLXXXIII = 673

DLLLXXXIV = 674

DLLLXXXV = 675

DLLLXXXVI = 676

DLLLXXXVII = 677

DLLLXXXVIII = 678

DLLLXXXIX = 679

DC = 680                   Here we again see that we have exhausted the possibilities of the "Roman numeral" “L”(40), for the second digit of the number we are counting to, so, we must go to the next highest value in the "Roman numeric system"…”C”(160)…to get "520 + 160 = 680"…or, “D”+”C” = 680…

DCI = 681

DCII = 682

DCIII = 683

DCIV = 684

DCV = 685

DCVI = 686

DCVII = 687

DCVIII = 688

DCIX = 689

DCX = 690

DCXI = 691

DCXII = 692

DCXIII = 693

DCXIV = 694

DCXV = 695

DCXVI = 696

DCXVII = 697

DCXVIII = 698

DCXIX = 699

DCXX = 700

DCXXI = 701

DCXXII = 702

DCXXIII = 703

DCXXIV = 704

DCXXV = 705

DCXXVI = 706

DCXXVII = 707

DCXXVIII = 708

DCXXIX = 709

DCXXX = 710

DCXXXI = 711

DCXXXII = 712

DCXXXIII = 713

DCXXXIV = 714

DCXXXV = 715

DCXXXVI = 716

DCXXXVII = 717

DCXXXVIII = 718

DCXXXIX = 719

DCL = 720              Here we add 520+160+40 = 720…or, “D”+”C”+”L” = 720…and the system continues…

DCLI = 721

DCLII = 722

DCLIII = 723

DCLIV = 724

DCLV = 725

DCLVI = 726

DCLVII = 727

DCLVIII = 728

DCLIX = 729

DCLX = 730

DCLXI = 731

DCLXII = 732

DCLXIII = 733

DCLXIV = 734

DCLXV = 735

DCLXVI = 736

DCLXVII = 737

DCLXVIII = 738

DCLXIX = 739

DCLXX = 740

DCLXXI = 741

DCLXXII = 742

DCLXXIII = 743

DCLXXIV = 744

DCLXXV = 745

DCLXXVI = 746

DCLXXVII = 747

DCLXXVIII = 748

DCLXXIX = 749

DCLXXX = 750

DCLXXXI = 751

DCLXXXII = 752

DCLXXXIII = 753

DCLXXXIV = 754

DCLXXXV = 755

DCLXXXVI = 756

DCLXXXVII = 757

DCLXXXVIII = 758

DCLXXXIX = 759

DCLL = 760

DCLLI = 761

DCLLII = 762

DCLLIII = 763

DCLLIV = 764

DCLLV = 765

DCLLVI = 766

DCLLVII = 767

DCLLVIII = 768

DCLLIX = 769

DCLLX = 770

DCLLXI = 771

DCLLXII = 772

DCLLXIII = 773

DCLLXIV = 774

DCLLXV = 775

DCLLXVI = 776

DCLLXVII = 777

DCLLXVIII = 778

DCLLXIX = 779

DCLLXX = 780

DCLLXXI = 781

DCLLXXII = 782

DCLLXXIII = 783

DCLLXXIV = 784

DCLLXXV = 785

DCLLXXVI = 786

DCLLXXVII = 787

DCLLXXVIII = 788

DCLLXXIX = 789

DCLLXXX = 790

DCLLXXXI = 791

DCLLXXXII = 792

DCLLXXXIII = 793

DCLLXXXIV = 794

DCLLXXXV = 795

DCLLXXXVI = 796

DCLLXXXVII = 797

DCLLXXXVIII = 798

DCLLXXXIX = 799

DCLLL = 800

DCLLLI = 801

DCLLLII = 802

DCLLLIII = 803

DCLLLIV = 804

DCLLLV = 805

DCLLLVI = 806

DCLLLVII = 807

DCLLLVIII = 808

DCLLLIX = 809

DCLLLX = 810

DCLLLXI = 811

DCLLLXII = 812

DCLLLXIII = 813

DCLLLXIV = 814

DCLLLXV = 815

DCLLLXVI = 816

DCLLLXVII = 817

DCLLLXVIII = 818

DCLLLXIX = 819

DCLLLXX = 820

DCLLLXXI = 821

DCLLLXXII = 822

DCLLLXXIII = 823

DCLLLXXIV = 824

DCLLLXXV = 825

DCLLLXXVI = 826

DCLLLXXVII = 827

DCLLLXXVIII = 828

DCLLLXXIX = 829

DCLLLXXX = 830

DCLLLXXXI = 831
DCLLLXXXII = 832
DCLLLXXXIII = 833
DCLLLXXXIV = 834
DCLLLXXXV = 835
DCLLLXXXVI = 836
DCLLLXXXVII = 837
DCLLLXXXVIII = 838
DCLLLXXXIX = 839
DCC = 840

   Out of time at the library…I may decide to count all the way to 4389 (“MMMXXXIX”, in "Roman numerals")…it could take a while though, clearly i have it…what to do after 1000 is going to be interesting…it should be more of the same, and i am certain i have re-derived the "Roman numeric system"…for all time--

   i am resuming counting to 4389 today, here goes--

DCCI = 841

DCCII = 842

DCCIII = 843

DCCiV = 844

DCCV = 845

DCCVI = 846

DCCVII = 847

DCCVIII = 848

DCCIX = 849

DCCX = 850

DCCXI = 851

DCCXII = 852

DCCXIII = 853

DCCXIV = 854

DCCXV = 855

DCCXVI = 856

DCCXVII = 857

DCCXVIII = 858

DCCXIX = 859

DCCXX = 860

DCCXXI = 861

DCCXXII = 862

DCCXXIII = 863

DCCXXIV = 864

DCCXXV = 865 

DCCXXVI = 866

DCCXXVII = 867

DCCXXVIII = 868

DCCXXIX = 869

DCCXXX = 870

DCCXXXI = 871

DCCXXXII = 872

DCCXXXIII = 873

DCCXXXIV = 874

DCCXXXV = 875

DCCXXXVI = 876

DCCXXXVII = 877

DCCXXXVIII = 878

DCCXXXIX = 879

DCCL = 880

DCCLI = 881

DCCLII = 882

DCCLIII = 883

DCCLIV = 884

DCCLV = 885

DCCLVI = 886

DCCLVII = 887

DCCLVIII = 888

DCCLIX = 889

DCCLX = 890

DCCLXI = 891

DCCLXII 892

DCCLXIII = 893

DCCLXIV = 894

DCCLXV = 895

DCCLXVI = 896

DCCLXVII = 897

DCCLXVIII = 898

DCCLXIX = 899

DCCLXX = 900

DCCLXXI = 901

DCCLXXII = 902

DCCLXXIII = 903

DCCLXXIV = 904

DCCLXXV = 905

DCCLXXVI = 906

DCCLXXVII = 907

DCCLXXVIII = 908

DCCLXXIX = 909

DCCLXXX = 910

DCCLXXXI = 911

DCCLXXXII = 912

DCCLXXXIII = 913

DCCLXXXIV = 914

DCCLXXXV = 915

DCCLXXXVI = 916

DCCLXXXVII = 917

DCCLXXXVIII = 918

DCCLXXXIX = 919

DCCLL = 920

DCCLLI = 921

DCCLLII = 922

DCCLLIII = 923

DCCLLIV = 924

DCCLLV = 925

DCCLLVI = 926

DCCLLVII = 927

DCCLLVIII = 928

DCCLLIX = 929

DCCLLX = 930

DCCLLXI = 931

DCCLLXII = 932

DCCLLXIII = 933

DCCLLXIV = 934

DCCLLXV = 935

DCCLLXVI = 936

DCCLLXVII = 937

DCCLLXVIII = 938

DCCLLXIX =  939

DCCLLXX = 940

DCCLLXXI = 941

DCCLLXXII = 942

DCCLLXXIII = 943

DCCLLXXIV = 944

DCCLLXXV = 945

DCCLLXXVI = 946

DCCLLXXVII = 947

DCCLLXXVIII = 948

DCCLLXXIX = 949

DCCLLXXX = 950

DCCLLXXXI = 951

DCCLLXXXII = 952

DCCLLXXXIII = 953

DCCLLXXXIV = 954

DCCLLXXXV = 955

DCCLLXXXVI = 956

DCCLLXXXVII = 957

DCCLLXXXVIII = 958

DCCLLXXXIX = 959

DCCLLL = 960

DCCLLLI = 961

DCCLLLII = 962

DCCLLLIII = 963

DCCLLLIV = 964

DCCLLLV = 965

DCCLLLVI = 966

DCCLLLVII = 967

DCCLLLVIII = 968

DCCLLLIX = 969

DCCLLLX = 970

DCCLLLXI = 971

DCCLLLXII = 972

DCCLLLXIII = 973

DCCLLLXIV = 974

DCCLLLXV = 975

DCCLLLXVI = 976

DCCLLLXVII = 977

DCCLLLXVIII = 978

DCCLLLXIX = 979

DCCLLLXX = 980

DCCLLLXXI = 981

DCCLLLXXII = 982

DCCLLLXXIII = 983

DCCLLLXXIV = 984

DCCLLLXXV = 985

DCCLLLXXVI = 986

DCCLLLXXVII = 987

DCCLLLXXVIII = 988

DCCLLLXXIX = 989

DCCLLLXXX = 990

DCCLLLXXXI = 991

DCCLLLXXXII = 992

DCCLLLXXXIII = 993

DCCLLLXXXIV = 994

DCCLLLXXXV = 995

DCCLLLXXXVI = 996

DCCLLLXXXVII = 997

DCCLLLXXXVIII = 998

DCCLLLXXXIX = 999

DCCC = 1000

DCCCI = 1001

DCCCII = 1002

DCCCIII = 1003

DCCCIV = 1004

DCCCV = 1005

DCCCVI = 1006

DCCCVII = 1007

DCCCVIII = 1008

DCCCIX = 1009

DCCCX = 1010

DCCCXI = 1011

DCCCXII = 1012

DCCCXIII = 1013

DCCCXIV = 1014

DCCCXV = 1015

DCCCXVI = 1016

DCCCXVII = 1017

DCCCXVIII = 1018

DCCCXIX = 1019

DCCCXX = 1020

DCCCXXI = 1021

DCCCXXII = 1022
DCCCXXIII = 1023

DCCCXXIV = 1024

DCCCXXV = 1025

DCCCXXVI = 1026

DCCCXXVII = 1027

DCCCXXVIII = 1028

DCCCXXIX = 1029

DCCCXXX = 1030

DCCCXXXI = 1031

DCCCXXXII = 1032

DCCCXXXIII = 1033

DCCCXXXIV = 1034

DCCCXXXV = 1035

DCCCXXXVI = 1036

DCCCXXXVII = 1037

DCCCXXXVIII = 1038

DCCCXXXIX = 1039

DD = 1040 <<<--- here we see that after we have expended three of the same roman numerals that are the next highest numeral below the value of "D"(520), plus three "X" values, plus "IX"(9), displayed as "DCCCXXXIX"( 520 + 160 + 160 + 160 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 9)...which is 1039...we then go to "DD"(520 + 520 =1040), and the pattern continues, as previously--

DDI = 1041

DDII = 1042

DDIII = 1043

DDIV = 1043

DDV = 1045

DDVI = 1046

DDVII = 1047

DDVIII = 1048

DDIX = 1049

DDX = 1050

DDXI = 1051

DDXII = 1052

DDXIII = 1053

DDXIV = 1054

DDXV = 1055

DDXVI = 1056

DDXVII = 1057

DDXVIII = 1058

DDXIX = 1059

DDXX = 1060

DDXXI = 1061

DDXXII = 1062

DDXXIII = 1063

DDXXIV = 1064

DDXXV = 1065

DDXXVI = 1066

DDXXVII = 1067

DDXXVIII = 1068

DDXXIX = 1069

DDXXX = 1070

DDXXXI = 1071

DDXXXII = 1072

DDXXXIII = 1073

DDXXXIV = 1074

DDXXXV = 1075

DDXXXVI = 1076

DDXXXVII = 1077

DDXXXVIII = 1078

DDXXXIX = 1079

DDL = 1080

DDLI = 1081

DDLII = 1082

DDLIII = 1083

DDLIV = 1084

DDLV = 1085

DDLVI = 1086

DDLVII = 1087

DDLVIII = 1088

DDLIX = 1089

DDLX = 1090

DDLXI = 1091

DDLXII = 1092

DDLXIII = 1093

DDLXIV = 1094

DDLXV = 1095

DDLXVI = 1096

DDLXVII = 1097

DDLXVIII = 1098

DDLXIX = 1099

DDLXX = 1100

DDLXXI = 1101

DDLXXII = 1102

DDLXXIII = 1103

DDLXXIV = 1104

DDLXXV = 1105

DDLXXVI = 1106

DDLXXVII = 1107

DDLXXVIII = 1108

DDLXXIX = 1109

DDLXXX = 1110

DDLXXXI = 1111

DDLXXXII = 1112

DDLXXXIII = 1113

DDLXXXIV = 1114

DDLXXXV = 1115

DDLXXXVI = 1116

DDLXXXVII = 1117

DDLXXXVIII = 1118

DDLXXXIX = 1119

DDLL = 1120

DDLLI = 1121

DDLLII = 1122

DDLLIII = 1123

DDLLIV = 1124

DDLLV = 1125

DDLLVI = 1126

DDLLVII = 1127

DDLLVIII = 1128

DDLLIX = 1129

DDLLX = 1130

DDLLXI = 1131

DDLLXII = 1132

DDLLXIII = 1133

DDLLXIV = 1134

DDLLXV = 1135

DDLLXVI = 1136

DDLLXVII = 1137

DDLLXVIII = 1138

DDLLXIX = 1139

DDLLXX = 1140

DDLLXXI = 1141

DDLLXXII = 1142

DDLLXXIII = 1143

DDLLXXIV = 1144

DDLLXXV = 1145

DDLLXXVI = 1146

DDLLXXVII = 1147

DDLLXXVIII = 1148

DDLLXXIX = 1149

DDLLXXX = 1150

DDLLXXXI = 1151

DDLLXXXII = 1152

DDLLXXXIII = 1153

DDLLXXXIV = 1154

DDLLXXXV = 1155

DDLLXXXVI = 1156

DDLLXXXVII = 1157

DDLLXXXVIII = 1158

DDLLXXXIX = 1159

DDLLL = 1160

DDLLLI = 1161

DDLLLII = 1162

DDLLLIII = 1163

DDLLLIV = 1164

DDLLLV = 1165

DDLLLVI = 1166

DDLLLVII = 1167

DDLLLVIII = 1168

DDLLLIX = 1169

DDLLLX = 1170

DDLLLXI = 1171

DDLLLXII = 1172

DDLLLXIII = 1173

DDLLLXIV = 1174

DDLLLXV = 1175

DDLLLXVI = 1176

DDLLLXVII = 1177

DDLLLXVIII = 1178

DDLLLXIX = 1179

DDLLLXX = 1180

DDLLLXXI = 1181

DDLLLXXII = 1182

DDLLLXXIII = 1183

DDLLLXXIV = 1184

DDLLLXXV = 1185

DDLLLXXVI 1186

DDLLLXXVII = 1187

DDLLLXXVIII = 1188

DDLLLXXIX = 1189

DDLLLXXX = 1190

DDLLLXXXI = 1191

DDLLLXXXII = 1192

DDLLLXXXIII = 1193

DDLLLXXXIV = 1194

DDLLLXXXV = 1195

DDLLLXXXVI = 1196

DDLLLXXXVII = 1197

DDLLLXXXVIII = 1198

DDLLLXXXIX = 1199

DDC = 1200

DDCI = 1201

DDCII = 1202

DDCIII = 1203

DDCIV = 1204

DDCV = 1205

DDCVI = 1206

DDCVII = 1207

DDCVIII = 1208

DDCIX = 1209

DDCX = 1210

DDCXI = 1211

DDCXII = 1212

DDCXIII = 1213

DDCXIV = 1214

DDCXV = 1215

DDCXVI = 1216

DDCXVII = 1217

DDCXVIII = 1218

DDCXIX = 1219

DDCXX = 1220

DDCXXI = 1221

DDCXXII = 1222

DDCXXIII = 1223

DDCXXIV = 1224

DDCXXV = 1225

DDCXXVI = 1226

DDCXXVII = 1227

DDCXXVIII = 1228

DDCXXIX = 1229

DDCXXX = 1230

DDCXXXI = 1231

DDCXXXII = 1232

DDCXXXIII = 1233

DDCXXXIV = 1234

DDCXXXV = 1235

DDCXXXVI = 1236

DDCXXXVII = 1237

DDCXXXVIII = 1238

DDCXXXIX = 1239

DDCL = 1240

DDCLI = 1241

DDCLII = 1242

DDCLIII = 1243

DDCLIV = 1244

DDCLV = 1245

DDCLVI = 1246

DDCLVII = 1247

DDCLVIII = 1248

DDCLIX = 1249

DDCLX = 1250

DDCLXI = 1251

DDCLXII = 1252

DDCLXIII = 1253

DDCLXIV = 1254

DDCLXV = 1255

DDCLXVI = 1256

DDCLXVII = 1257

DDCLXVIII = 1258

DDCLXIX = 1259

DDCLXX = 1260

DDCLXXI = 1261

DDCLXXII = 1262

DDCLXXIII = 1263

DDCLXXIV = 1264

DDCLXXV = 1265

DDCLXXVI = 1266

DDCLXXVII = 1267

DDCLXXVIII = 1268

DDCLXXIX = 1269

DDCLXXX = 1270

DDCLXXXI = 1271

DDCLXXXII = 1272

DDCLXXXIII = 1273

DDCLXXXIV = 1274

DDCLXXXV = 1275

DDCLXXXVI = 1276

DDCLXXXVII = 1277

DDCLXXXVIII = 1278

DDCLXXXIX = 1279

DDCLL = 1280

DDCLLI = 1281

DDCLLII = 1282

DDCLLIII = 1283

DDCLLIV = 1284

DDCLLV = 1285

DDCLLVI = 1286

DDCLLVII = 1287

DDCLLVIII = 1288

DDCLLIX = 1289

DDCLLX = 1290

DDCLLXI = 1291

DDCLLXII = 1292

DDCLLXIII = 1293

DDCLLXIV = 1294

DDCLLXV = 1295

DDCLLXVI = 1296

DDCLLXVII = 1297

DDCLLXVIII = 1298

DDCLLXIX = 1299

DDCLLXX = 1300

DDCLLXXI = 1301

DDCLLXXII = 1302

DDCLLXXIII = 1303

DDCLLXXIV = 1304

DDCLLXXV = 1305

DDCLLXXVI = 1306

DDCLLXXVII = 1307

DDCLLXXVIII = 1308

DDCLLXXIX = 1309

DDCLLXXX = 1310

DDCLLXXXI = 1311

DDCLLXXXII = 1312

DDCLLXXXIII = 1313

DDCLLXXXIV = 1314

DDCLLXXXV = 1315

DDCLLXXXVI = 1316

DDCLLXXXVII = 1317

DDCLLXXXVIII = 1318

DDCLLXXXIX = 1319

DDCLLL = 1320

DDCLLLI = 1321

DDCLLLII = 1322

DDCLLLIII = 1323

DDCLLLIV = 1324

DDCLLLV = 1325

DDCLLLVI = 1326

DDCLLLVII = 1327

DDCLLLVIII = 1328

DDCLLLIX = 1329

DDCLLLX = 1330

DDCLLLXI = 1331

DDCLLLXII = 1332

DDCLLLXIII = 1333

DDCLLLXIV = 1334

DDCLLLXV = 1335

DDCLLLXVI = 1336

DDCLLLXVII = 1337

DDCLLLXVIII = 1338

DDCLLLXIX = 1339

DDCLLLXX = 1340

DDCLLLXXI = 1341

DDCLLLXXII = 1342

DDCLLLXXIII = 1343

DDCLLLXXIV = 1344

DDCLLLXXV = 1345

DDCLLLXXVI = 1346

DDCLLLXXVII = 1347

DDCLLLXXVIII = 1348

DDCLLLXXIX = 1349

DDCLLLXXX = 1350

DDCLLLXXXI = 1351

DDCLLLXXXII = 1352

DDCLLLXXXIII = 1353

DDCLLLXXXIV = 1354

DDCLLLXXXV = 1355

DDCLLLXXXVI = 1356

DDCLLLXXXVII = 1357

DDCLLLXXXVIII = 1358

DDCLLLXXXIX = 1359

DDCC = 1360

DDCCI = 1361

DDCCII = 1362

DDCCIII = 1363

DDCCIV = 1364

DDCCV = 1365

DDCCVI = 1366

DDCCVII = 1367

DDCCVIII = 1368

DDCCIX = 1369

DDCCX = 1370

DDCCXI = 1371

DDCCXII = 1372

DDCCXIII = 1373

DDCCXIV = 1374

DDCCXV = 1375

DDCCXVI = 1376

DDCCXVII = 1377

DDCCXVIII = 1378

DDCCXIX = 1379

DDCCXX = 1380

DDCCXXI = 1381

DDCCXXII = 1382

DDCCXXIII = 1383

DDCCXXIV = 1384

DDCCXXV = 1385

DDCCXXVI = 1386

DDCCXXVII = 1387

DDCCXXVIII = 1388

DDCCXXIX = 1389

DDCCXXX = 1390

DDCCXXXI = 1391

DDCCXXXII = 1392

DDCCXXXIII = 1393

DDCCXXXIV = 1394

DDCCXXXV = 1395

DDCCXXXVI = 1396

DDCCXXXVII = 1397

DDCCXXXVIII = 1398

DDCCXXXIX = 1399

DDCCL = 1400

DDCCLI = 1401

DDCCLII = 1402

DDCCLIII = 1403

DDCCLIV = 1404

DDCCLV = 1405

DDCCLVI = 1406

DDCCLVII = 1407

DDCCLVIII = 1408

DDCCLIX = 1409

DDCCLX = 1410

DDCCLXI = 1411

DDCCLXII = 1412

DDCCLXIII = 1413

DDCCLXIV = 1414

DDCCLXV = 1415

DDCCLXVI = 1416

DDCCLXVII = 1417

DDCCLXVIII = 1418

DDCCLXIX = 1419

DDCCLXX = 1420

DDCCLXXI = 1421

DDCCLXXII = 1422

DDCCLXXIII = 1423

DDCCLXXIV = 1424

DDCCLXXV = 1425

DDCCLXXVI = 1426

DDCCLXXVII = 1427

DDCCLXXVIII = 1428

DDCCLXXIX = 1429

DDCCLXXX = 1430

DDCCLXXXI = 1431

DDCCLXXXII = 1432

DDCCLXXXIII = 1433

DDCCLXXXIV = 1434

DCDCCLXXXV = 1435

DDCCLXXXVI = 1436

DDCCLXXXVII = 1437

DDCCLXXXVIII = 1438

DDCCLXXXIX = 1439

DDCCLL = 1440

DDCCLLI = 1441

DDCCLLII = 1442

DDCCLLIII = 1443

DDCLLIV = 1444

DDCCLLV = 1445

DDCCLLVI = 1446

DDCCLLVII = 1447

DDCCLLVIII = 1448

DDCCLLIX = 1449

DDCCLLX = 1450

DDCCLLXI = 1451

DDCCLLXII = 1452

DDCCLLXIII = 1453

DDCLLXIV = 1454

DDCCLLXV = 1455

DDCCLLXVI = 1456

DDCCLLXVII = 1457

DDCCLLXVIII = 1458

DDCCLLXIX = 1459

DDCCLLXX = 1460

DDCCLLXXI = 1461

DDCCLLXXII = 1462

DDCCLLXXIII = 1463

DDCCLLXXIV = 1464

DDCCLLXXV = 1465

DDCCLLXXVI = 1466

DDCCLLXXVII = 1467

DDCCLLXXVIII = 1468

DDCCLLXXIX = 1469

DDCCLLXXX = 1470

DDCLLXXXI = 1471

DDCCLLXXXII = 1472

DDCCLLXXXIII = 1473

DDCCLLXXXIV = 1474

DDCCLLXXXV = 1475

DDCCLLXXXVI = 1476

DDCCLLXXXVII = 1477 

DDCCLLXXXVIII = 1478

DDCCLLXXXIX = 1479

DDCCLLL = 1480

DDCCLLLI = 1481

DDCCLLLII = 1482

DDCCLLLIII = 1483

DDCCLLLIV = 1484

DDCCLLLV = 1485

DDCCLLLVI = 1486

DDCCLLLVII = 1487

DDCCLLLVIII = 1488

DDCCLLLIX = 1489

DDCCLLLX = 1490

DDCCLLLXI = 1491

DDCCLLLXII = 1492

DDCCLLLXIII = 1493

DDCCLLLXIV = 1494

DDCCLLLXV = 1495

DDCCLLLXVI = 1496

DDCCLLLXVII = 1497

DDCCLLLXVIII = 1498

DDCCLLLXIX = 1499

DDCCLLLXX = 1500

DDCCLLLXXI = 1501

DDCCLLLXXII = 1502

DDCCLLLXXIII = 1503

DDCCLLLXXIV = 1504

DDCCLLLXXV = 1505

DDCCLLLXXVI = 1506

DDCCLLLXXVII = 1507

DDCCLLLXXVIII = 1508

DDCCLLLXXIX = 1509

DDCCLLLXXX = 1510

DDCCLLLXXXI = 1511

DDCCLLLXXXII = 1512

DDCCLLLXXXIII = 1513

DDCCLLLXXXIV = 1514

DDCCLLLXXXV = 1515

DDCCLLLXXXVI = 1516

DDCCLLLXXXVII = 1517

DDCCLLLXXXVIII = 1518

DDCCLLLXXXIX = 1519

DDCCC = 1520

DDCCCI = 1521

DDCCCII = 1522

DDCCCIII = 1523

DDCCCIV = 1524

DDCCCV = 1525

DDCCCVI = 1526

DDCCCVII = 1527

DDCCCVIII = 1528

DDCCCIX = 1529

DDCCCX = 1530

DDCCCXI = 1531

DDCCCXII = 1532

DDCCCXIII = 1533

DDCCCXIV = 1534

DDCCCXV = 1535

DDCCCXVI = 1536

DDCCCXVII = 1537

DDCCCXVIII = 1538

DDCCCXIX = 1539

DDCCCXX = 1540

DDCCCXXI = 1541

DDCCCXXII = 1542

DDCCCXXIII = 1543

DDCCCXXIV = 1544

DDCCCXXV = 1545

DDCCCXXVI = 1546

DDCCCXXVII = 1547

DDCCCXXVIII = 1548

DDCCCXXIX = 1549

DDCCCXXX = 1550

DDCCCXXXI = 1551

DDCCCXXXII = 1552

DDCCCXXXIII = 1553

DDCCCXXXIV = 1554

DDCCCXXXV = 1555

DDCCCXXXVI = 1556

DDCCCXXXVII = 1557

DDCCCXXXVIII = 1558

DDCCCXXXIX = 1559

DDD = 1560

DDDI = 1561

DDDII = 1562

DDDIII = 1563

DDDIV = 1564

DDDV = 1565

DDDVI = 1566

DDDVII = 1567

DDDVIII = 1668

DDDIX = 1569

DDDX = 1570

DDDXI = 1571

DDDXII = 1572

DDDXIII = 1573

DDDXIV = 1574

DDDXV = 1575

DDDXVI = 1576

DDDXVII = 1577

DDDXVIII = 1578

DDDXIX = 1579

DDDXX = 1580

DDDXXI = 1581

DDDXXII = 1582

DDDXXIII = 1583

DDDXXIV = 1584

DDDXXV = 1585

DDDXXVI = 1586

DDDXXVII = 1587

DDDXXVIII = 1588

DDDXXIX = 1589

DDDXXX = 1590

DDDXXXI = 1591

DDDXXXII = 1592

DDDXXXIII = 1593

DDDXXXIV = 1594

DDDXXXV = 1595

DDDXXXVI 1596

DDDXXXVII = 1597

DDDXXXVIII = 1598

DDDXXXIX = 1599

M = 1600

MI = 1601

    looks good, the pattern works all the way to 1600, i am going to start a new post for the numbers from 1600 to 4839, due to size constraints of this post( it' slowing down my "puter" very much))....again, i'm going all the way to 4839( a phaylanx), in a second post about the roman numerals--

Best wishes, john kruschke--  

i started 06/02/2016, resumed work on  10/21/202020--