i recently came up with a simple way to eliminate asthma, from an epiphany, about my childhood( the device should cure, or reduce, it's effects on a patient), the apparatus is still in the development stages( a pocket-sized, powerful tool, to eliminate a serious problem)...
--the concept is simple, and i believe it to be sound--
the "pre-vent bronchial dilator"--
the idea is not complex in nature, if a person has bronchial constriction, from exposure to allergens that trigger an airway constriction( response), a solution must be found, to ensure a good( viable), diameter of the bronchial tubes, thus maintaining proper air-flow...
--to accomplish this, i believe looking at the bronchial diameter in numbers, will be of great use--
the issue--
before exposure to an allergen, the diameter of a person's bronchi are "20mm"( random number), after the person's body constricts the bronchi( from exposure), to stop the flow of offending air particles( allergens), the diameter is "10mm", thus an inadequate air-flow, and discomfort/poor breathing, results...
conclusion--
i suggest, that if the airway( bronchi), are enlarged to "30mm"( via use of the "bronchial dilator"), that, although the body will still react to the negative stimuli( allergen), by contracting the bronchi "10mm", the air-flow will remain good/viable( a value of 20mm), as 30mm - 10mm( constriction from allergen exposure) = 20mm( ideal bronchial airway diameter)--
example--
(mm)
(non-prevent) (mm)
(using patient's) (mm) (total allergic)
(bronchi diameter) (bronchi diameter) (constriction of)
(before exposure) - (after exposure) = (airway diameter)
20 - 10 = 10
(mm)
(patient bronchi) (mm) (mm)
(diameter that uses) (total allergic) (pre-vent user's)
(pre-vent dilator) (constriction of) (bronchial diameter)
(before exposure) - (airway diameter) = (after exposure) (a good)
30 - 10 = 20 (air-flow diameter)
to accomplish the enlargement of the bronchi, i feel that a simple mouthpiece could be constructed, that has an aperture, to restrict flow( like a trumpet's mouthpiece, a harmonica, or a kazoo has, that a child plays)... a good model to demonstrate this concept, is to have a patient blow up a balloon, and then have a doctor, or nurse, squeeze the balloon's sides, while they inflate it, causing a slight back-pressure, on the bronchial tubes, and enlarging them( stretching), a small amount--
walking, while breathing in through the nose, and out through the mouth, with "pursed lips"( holding the mouth slightly closed, until a pressure is felt in the cheeks, while exhaling), will also produce bronchial enlargement, from the back-pressure against the bronchial tubes being produced--
i enjoy the walking procedure best( for myself), although i imagine the sight is a tad silly for others to see...the trade-off is acceptable( less cute...more able), perhaps i look like "brando" when i do it??( i have no data for this conclusion at this time)--
i plan to make a simple pocket-sized device, for a friend, from a diving snorkel, that has changeable apertures, so the device can be "dialed-in", to the specific needs of the patient/person using it--
--i will post a photo of the completed device as soon as i am able--
--the concept is simple, and i believe it to be sound--
the "pre-vent bronchial dilator"--
the idea is not complex in nature, if a person has bronchial constriction, from exposure to allergens that trigger an airway constriction( response), a solution must be found, to ensure a good( viable), diameter of the bronchial tubes, thus maintaining proper air-flow...
--to accomplish this, i believe looking at the bronchial diameter in numbers, will be of great use--
the issue--
before exposure to an allergen, the diameter of a person's bronchi are "20mm"( random number), after the person's body constricts the bronchi( from exposure), to stop the flow of offending air particles( allergens), the diameter is "10mm", thus an inadequate air-flow, and discomfort/poor breathing, results...
conclusion--
i suggest, that if the airway( bronchi), are enlarged to "30mm"( via use of the "bronchial dilator"), that, although the body will still react to the negative stimuli( allergen), by contracting the bronchi "10mm", the air-flow will remain good/viable( a value of 20mm), as 30mm - 10mm( constriction from allergen exposure) = 20mm( ideal bronchial airway diameter)--
example--
(mm)
(non-prevent) (mm)
(using patient's) (mm) (total allergic)
(bronchi diameter) (bronchi diameter) (constriction of)
(before exposure) - (after exposure) = (airway diameter)
20 - 10 = 10
(mm)
(patient bronchi) (mm) (mm)
(diameter that uses) (total allergic) (pre-vent user's)
(pre-vent dilator) (constriction of) (bronchial diameter)
(before exposure) - (airway diameter) = (after exposure) (a good)
30 - 10 = 20 (air-flow diameter)
to accomplish the enlargement of the bronchi, i feel that a simple mouthpiece could be constructed, that has an aperture, to restrict flow( like a trumpet's mouthpiece, a harmonica, or a kazoo has, that a child plays)... a good model to demonstrate this concept, is to have a patient blow up a balloon, and then have a doctor, or nurse, squeeze the balloon's sides, while they inflate it, causing a slight back-pressure, on the bronchial tubes, and enlarging them( stretching), a small amount--
walking, while breathing in through the nose, and out through the mouth, with "pursed lips"( holding the mouth slightly closed, until a pressure is felt in the cheeks, while exhaling), will also produce bronchial enlargement, from the back-pressure against the bronchial tubes being produced--
i enjoy the walking procedure best( for myself), although i imagine the sight is a tad silly for others to see...the trade-off is acceptable( less cute...more able), perhaps i look like "brando" when i do it??( i have no data for this conclusion at this time)--
i plan to make a simple pocket-sized device, for a friend, from a diving snorkel, that has changeable apertures, so the device can be "dialed-in", to the specific needs of the patient/person using it--
--i will post a photo of the completed device as soon as i am able--
No comments:
Post a Comment