the concept--
from "distance-to-geo-sync" math, i have concluded, that the object closest to
a "gravitational force"( planet), is the lightest, and that all objects in "geo-sync", are arranged from lightest( closest), to heaviest( farthest away), from the center of the "gravitational force"( planet)--
conclusion--
i feel this is due to objects in "geo-sync" orbit, with a "gravitational force"( planet), being an equal distance from the "gravitational source"/planet's surface( in feet), as they weigh( in pounds)...therefore, i suggest, that the planets in our solar system, are also behaving like our moon and satellites, that are in "geo-sync" orbit with the earth( the satellites are orbiting closer to the earth than our moon, in "geo-sync"...as they are lighter, displaying this concept very well), as we can see, the sun has all the planets in our solar system in "geo-sync" orbit, with it, and i feel the mass of each, to be greater, and greater, as the distance from the sun's surface( exterior), increases...until the distance from the sun's gravity, becomes so far, that "gravitational pull" is no longer a factor, on other objects--
summary--
i believe our solar system's "filling pattern", is arranged by the weight( mass), of the planets in orbit with the sun, some of the orbits of the planets in our system, are elliptical in nature, due to the other "gravitational forces"( planets), acting upon each other, to a degree...thereby elongating the vector of some of the planets, in "geo-sync" orbit with the sun--
best wishes, john kruschke--
(cs)
No comments:
Post a Comment